Encyclopedia Titanica Message Board » Other Ships and Shipwrecks » US Navy » Going Down With the Ships « Previous Next »
Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Michael H. Standart
Moderator
Username: mstandart

Post Number: 12052
Registered: 12-2000
Posted on Thursday, March 8, 2007 - 7:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

From the Washington Post:

quote:


By Craig Hooper
Monday, March 5, 2007; Page A15

Over the past six years, 79 condemned Navy ships have been towed out to sea and destroyed by Air Force bombs, submarine-launched torpedoes or hails of gunfire. These exercises, long considered the most cost-effective way to dispose of unwanted naval vessels, have eaten away at America's inventory of still-useful retired warships. Soon every vessel capable of serving in America's reserve combat fleet could vanish, leaving an overextended Navy with no viable backup forces. This unwise drawdown goes against Navy tradition.

As the Navy budget, already under pressure because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, is hoarded for new shipbuilding initiatives, the inactive reserve, an emergency fleet of second-string warships, is quietly becoming a sham.

Denied maintenance funding and protected only from "fire, flooding and pilferage," decommissioned warships are quickly deteriorating past any hope of recall. The aircraft carrier USS Constellation, "mothballed" in 2003, went from the battle fleet to designation for the artificial-reef donation program in a mere three years.


For the rest of this editorial, go to http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/04/AR2007030401049.html

Comment: He's got a point. I don't think he appriciates just how much time it takes to bring a ship back to full active status from mothballs or the problems of block obsolesence which condemned some of these vessels to the boneyards before their time, and some of his history is a tad inaccurate, but he does have a point.
Cordially,
Michael H. Standart
Equal Opportunity Curmudgeon
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:
Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions Administration

Add Content
Message Board
Email Updates and News
RSS
Store
Encyclopedia Titanica
Terms of Use | Permissions | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
© 1996-2009 Encyclopedia Titanica
 
SitemapEmail UpdatesTitanic News
Passenger ListCrew ListSurvivorsVictimsOther Groups
Titanic Research ArticlesBook Reviews
Topics Search Instructions Rules Formatting Help Contact Moderators
Become an Editor How to Contribute Add a Story Add a Picture Add an Article Manage Contributions
Books Auctions
Register Update Profile Login Lost Password Logout