| Author
| Message
|
    
Jon Meadows
Member
Username: rockmedrzaius
Post Number: 22
Registered: 1-2006
| | Posted on Monday, April 24, 2006 - 8:45 pm: |       |
There is a photo of the wreck at the bottom of the page:
http://www.maritimequest.com/liners/kaiser_wilhelm_der_grosse/kaiser_wilhelm_der_grosse.htm
It says the hull was scrapped in 1952. |
Shelley Dziedzic
Moderator
Username: shelley
Post Number: 2156
Registered: 4-2001
| | Posted on Monday, April 24, 2006 - 9:48 pm: | |
Thanks for that link, it's an excellent web site I had not known about. There's a heartrending photo of the old Mauretania gutted at the breakers with just scraps of her beautiful stern left that I'd never seen. Some excellent photos seldom seen published- took some time to view 'em all.
www.revdma2.com |
Jason D. Tiller
Moderator
Username: jtiller
Post Number: 2290
Registered: 12-2000
| | Posted on Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 8:06 pm: | |
An excellent website, indeed. Thanks for the link, Jon.
"To be happy is to be contented in your own mind"...Harold Godfrey Lowe
43° 0' 39" N, 79° 0' 23" W. |
Jon_dalbyball
Member
Username: jon_dalbyball
Post Number: 59
Registered: 8-2009
| | Posted on Friday, August 28, 2009 - 8:33 am: | |
Anyone have any information on the wreck of the Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse from 1897 which was sunk during WW1 ? Has it ever been found ? Was wondering what was left of the wreck - for some reason I am always more interested/drawn to the 4 funneled liners.
Many thanks
Jon. |
Zack Wyatt
Member
Username: ship
Post Number: 48
Registered: 8-2009
| | Posted on Saturday, August 29, 2009 - 12:32 am: | |
It's a good thing the Kaiser Wilhelm Der Grosse was the first ocean liner to have 4 funnels, otherwise, the Titanic and Lusitania would not have had that many! |
Michael H. Standart
Moderator
Username: mstandart
Post Number: 29874
Registered: 12-2000
| | Posted on Saturday, August 29, 2009 - 6:20 am: | |
>>It's a good thing the Kaiser Wilhelm Der Grosse was the first ocean liner to have 4 funnels, otherwise, the Titanic and Lusitania would not have had that many!<<
Why not?
Cordially,
Michael H. Standart
Equal Opportunity Curmudgeon |
Jon_dalbyball
Member
Username: jon_dalbyball
Post Number: 60
Registered: 8-2009
| | Posted on Saturday, August 29, 2009 - 6:51 am: | |
>>It's a good thing the Kaiser Wilhelm Der Grosse was the first ocean liner to have 4 funnels, otherwise, the Titanic and Lusitania would not have had that many!<<
I think maybe it set a trend. Britain and Germany were always competing. Was the Mauretania and Lusitania not Britain's answer to those 1st few german 4 funnelled liners ? Then White Stars answer to Cunards Mauretania and Lusitania were the Olympic class. That said maybe it had nothing to do with the number of funnels - but you could be correct. I see where your coming from :-) |
Michael H. Standart
Moderator
Username: mstandart
Post Number: 29892
Registered: 12-2000
| | Posted on Saturday, August 29, 2009 - 7:44 am: | |
>>Was the Mauretania and Lusitania not Britain's answer to those 1st few german 4 funnelled liners ?<<
They were, but it's not quite as simple as you might think. The problem here is that Germany had the fast and fashionable ships and Morgan's IMM trust was trying to make some inroads on British shipping. The Cunard greyhounds were as much a part of the effort to keep a respected British line in British hands as it was to stop J.P. Morgan from taking over.
Fashion was a factor and that's a fair point to make but in the end, it was all about the money. Cunard and White Star wouldn't have spent a penny on fashion if it didn't fill the berths, and they weren't about to fill the berths if their ships were not faster, more comfortable, or both.
Cordially,
Michael H. Standart
Equal Opportunity Curmudgeon |
Closed: New threads not accepted on this page
US $474.60 1 Bid
