Encyclopedia Titanica

An Archival Study of Eyewitness Memory of the Titanic's Final Plunge

The Journal of General Psychology

   Join Us and Hide Ads

The article examines the accuracy of Titanic survivors’ testimonies regarding the ship’s final moments. The study aimed to determine if eyewitness accounts aligned with forensic evidence that the Titanic broke apart on the surface, despite early investigators’ conclusions that it sank intact.

by Todd C. Riniolo, Myriah Koledin, Gregory M. Drakulic & Robin A. Payne
Key Points

Eyewitness Reliability

Out of 20 survivors who testified on the Titanic’s condition during its plunge, 75% recalled it breaking apart, aligning with forensic findings.

Forensic Validation

Later explorations confirmed that the Titanic split on the surface, contrasting with official 1912 inquiries.

Stress and Memory

Contrary to theories suggesting high-stress events impair memory, most survivors accurately recalled central details of the traumatic event.

Methodological Limits

The study acknowledges limitations due to the unstructured 1912 inquiries and limited survivor testimonies.

Bias and Interpretation

Early investigators may have ignored survivor accounts due to biases favouring the Titanic’s “unsinkable” reputation.

Historical Significance

The findings contribute to understanding trauma memory and historical evidence validation.

Find it on doi.org

Encyclopedia Titanica is not responsible for the content of external sites, and the availability of links may change.

About Research References on Encyclopedia Titanica
This item is not available to read on Encyclopedia Titanica, but we have included it as a reference, provided a brief summary of the key points, and linked to the original source to help readers interested in the finer details of the Titanic story.

Related Biographies

George Rose

Find Related Items

Forensics Trauma Recall Archival Study Survivor Accounts Historical Inquiry Break-Up Survivor Accounts

Contribute

  Get in touch