Anyone know if Ballard sought to compile a stern section mosaic?
To date the only stern section mosaic I have seen was the 98' mosaic of bow and stern sections, done by Paul Mathias.
What do you all think of the 1998 mosaic?
Ballard's new book mentions a stern mosaic having been done this year, but nothing yet said on it being published in a book or magazine. I also want to see this 2004 stern photomosaic. The 1998 mosaic is ok, but the stern mosaic done was crappy, there are alot of errors on the entire mosaic that the mosaic's Ballard did don't have. The 1998 mosaic blots out and blurs areas easily seen in the 1987 bow section mosaic. A good example of this is the gymnasium/grandstaircase, the 1998 image shows a big blur in that location, while the new 2004 mosiac shows alot of detail in how it really looks.
I am not sure what one is expecting to see with any potential stern section mosaic - the overhead shots, save for the fantail and the spot where the aft davit for Boat No. 16 lies, reveal scarcely anything but a jumbled tangle of collapsed decking, bulkheads, etc. The third class entrance landing on D-deck still has a small collection of black and white floor tiles, but at this point, what else is there to see from overhead?
Footage revealed on television and in documentary 'specials' limit their shots of the stern probably because there's not much recognizable to *show*. The 1998 mosaic, as Mike Bill said, was coloured poorly (LOL) and was unclear at best from what I saw of it.
At least with the bow, which despite small 'discoveries' being made for the rivet-counters, has been thoroughly and redundantly explored, in my opinion, but also keep in mind most of the bow section is an entity that has much that is identifiable, in many aspects....
I see, but for the stern, I wished to see it because I'm curious to see a visual image of what's changed, as Ken's 2001 report said the upper decks of the remaining superstructure collapsed. Also if the mast on the bow section changed, what then of the stern section's mast?
I also say this because I'm making a wreck model of the Titanic as it looks in 2004.
..."it made the ship look like two giant turds".....
Great scott!! I didnt walk away with that impression. Your comparison is tantamount to heresy!
Well, Roy Mengot once mentioned in discussions with the Mathias team, that they didnt fully grasp what the stern looked like BEFORE the sinking, so there was a lot of guesswork...
Plus the 2nd class elevator house was much larger than it should be...
On a related note, did dr Ballard ever do a photomosaic of Lusitania?
How about Britannic?
I was wondering if anyone has a high resolution version of this mapping anywhere? I know the scan has a very ugly color to it but it would be interesting to see it up close, i have been unable to find anything on it outside of a old ebay auction, a low resolution version from the archive.org and in the answers from the abyss doc