These three single women
did not socialise much together
on the ship, as Winnie was more
gregarious than the other two.
She commented that Susan (Webber)
spent most of her time talking
over the gate between Second and
Third Class to a fellow from her home
town......
From Judith Geller's Women And Children First. That is what lead me to believe that Webber and Braund MIGHT, and I stress MIGHT, have been the couple of whom Beesley wrote. In her case there IS admittedly shaky evidence (I have no idea when Edwina Troutt made that claim, or whether or not she was familiar with the Beesley account and might have added that as a romantic detail to her tale- I also have no idea from where Judith Geller drew that fact and have no way of checking) that she spent time at the gate talking over it to someone in Third Class. About the Beesley quote- as a casual observer he would have had no way of knowing the relationship between the two (and governed by 1912 etiquette WOULD NOT have asked) and most likely made the easiest assumption- that they were husband and wife. Just as he made that assumption about William Harbeck and Henriette Yrois/Yvois. As to the level of passion in the respective letters- I agree with you; however, there would have been little opportunity for venting passion over the gate in broad daylight, and had there been a public display of affection other than a chaste kiss, given the standards of public decency in 1912 a quick stop would likely have been put to it. My guess is that the level of "physical intimacy" at the gate would have been the same between Lundin and her man as it would have been between Susan Webber and Mr. Braund. I'm not saying that the woman of whom Beesley wrote COULDN'T have been Olga Lundin. What I am saying is that there isn't enough evidence in his account to substantiate that it is, and that there is at least one bit of supporting evidence ,albeit not the best, that it COULD have been Miss Webber.