Hey, I think it is a little bit unfair the way some of you treat James Cameron's Titanic as if it should have been a documentery which it wasn't. Cameron has stated many times that this was not supposed to be a documentury, but a love story set on the titanic with history in it. Some of you say its one of the worst history documenteries of Titanic well thats not what it was suppoesed to be. You know why Cameron is so rich? Because he had a love story in there. Teenage girls aren't going to the theater to see a documentery of a ship that sank 90 years ago, they are going to see a love story. He was also a genius by putting Titanic in there because history buffs will go see it to see the ships recreation. I thought it was great the way Cameron combined the fiction with the actuall thing and having his characters interact with the real ones. All of the actors playing Smith, Ismay, etc look just like the actual thing. If you took antr and Camerons Titanic and had the exact same sets and special effects Camerons would do the best because its entertainment. Hes cleary stated this but you people still are plain stupid and compare it to a documentery. If you had the resources he did none of you could have made a better movie. So if some of you all are gonna act like know it alls atleast no what your talking about Cameron's is and all ways will be the best Titanic film ever.