Adam Usher
Member
Yeah but most of those are hilariously inaccurate. Most of them depict and insinuate Olympic going fast, which she wasn’t.But there are artists impressions readily available if you look out for them!
I’ve already read that three times. It does not reference anything showing any footage or images of the lightship’s wreck, only describing it.
The other link only shows images of the ships and images/artists impressions of the COLLISION, not the underwater wreck.
Probably no photos of the wreck. II’ve already read that three times. It does not reference anything showing any footage or images of the lightship’s wreck, only describing it.
The divers seem to have have scrubbed the photo's from the net. Seems that some of the divers were accused of looting the wreck so they probably said screw it and removed their photo's. Even the Wayback machine had no old links. Some claim its a protected wreck site, others say no.The other link only shows images of the ships and images/artists impressions of the COLLISION, not the underwater wreck.
Hm, it shouldn’t exactly be a wreck site. But that is quite odd. Don’t know why someone would loot a 30s lightship, not much you can get worth such a hazardous risk, given the currents.Probably no photos of the wreck. I
The divers seem to have have scrubbed the photo's from the net. Seems that some of the divers were accused of looting the wreck so they probably said screw it and removed their photo's. Even the Wayback machine had no old links. Some claim its a protected wreck site, others say no.
This might explain it better than I could.Hm, it shouldn’t exactly be a wreck site. But that is quite odd. Don’t know why someone would loot a 30s lightship, not much you can get worth such a hazardous risk, given the currents.