Crew Picture

Aug 16, 2016
60
9
18
It's a nice pic.
The ABs I could identify (from left to right):
- Top: 1 Archer, 5 Fleet, 6 Bright, 7 Osman
- Middle: 3 Hogg, 4 Vigott, 5 Horsewell, 6 Jones
- Bottom: 4 Evans, 5 Perkis
 
Jan 27, 2011
92
1
38
35
Cincinnati, Ohio
If I recall correctly, this was the one of the photos that Fleet gave Ed Kamuda back when He and Fleet were corresponding. Fleet actually sent this photo along with another one that is a studio photo him and some other crew members. One of the photos was large and Fleet actually had to bend it for it to be shipped. I think this my be the Adriatic with the crew going home from the US Inquiries. There is a commutator from 1993 that mentions all of this.
 
Jan 27, 2011
92
1
38
35
Cincinnati, Ohio
It'd be nice to get a copy of the studio photo.
Yeah I agree it would. I forget what volume it is but the pictures are in a 1993 Titanic Historical Society Commutator. The Cover of the Commutator has a image of the Captain Smith Statue. I'm sure if you look around you can find a copy of the issue fairly reasonable. The article in it on Frederick Fleet is a great article to read along with all the letters that Fleet and Kamuda wrote.
 

Ryan Burns

Member
Sep 23, 2016
121
21
28
37
As to the remaining man, I don't think any of the deck crew who have photographs match that man at all.

Joseph Scarrott
scarrott.jpg


Alfred Oliver
olliver_a.jpg


Alfred Evans
alfred-evans.jpg


William Harder
harderw.jpg


Samuel Hemming
hemming.jpg


Hichens
hichens_r_cr10.jpg


Archie Jewell
archie-jewell.jpg


Reginald Lee
reginald-robinson-lee.jpg


William Lucas
titanic-crew-william-arthur-lucas_100x100.jpg


Paddy McGough
Titanic-George-McGough_100x100.jpg


Charles Pascoe
pascoe.jpg


William Peters
william-chapman-peters-cr10_medium.jpg


John Poindegstre
poingdestre_thm.jpg


Walter Wynn
walter_wynn_photograph_1_10015.jpg


Thus, he is likely one of those two who we have no photos of that we can reference:

Able Seaman James Anderson - 40
Able Seaman Walter Brice - 43
 

Ryan Burns

Member
Sep 23, 2016
121
21
28
37
I've found a better photo of Pascoe and I think he is a much better candidate for the man who I thought might be Hopkins

LXW2ipQ.jpg
 
A

Andrew Williams

Guest
The Ist image on yesterday's post you confirm with a question mark is John Hopkins, the same image you now confirm is Charles Pascoe without a question mark. A bit strange?
 

Ryan Burns

Member
Sep 23, 2016
121
21
28
37
The Ist image on yesterday's post you confirm with a question mark is John Hopkins, the same image you now confirm is Charles Pascoe without a question mark. A bit strange?
Why is it strange? As I was making those I was still in the process of IDing them. I thought that guy might have been Hopkins but after finding a better pic of Pascoe, I'm now thinking that guy is almost certainly Pascoe (virtually identical protruding cheekbones and ears). Did I not explain myself well enough in the post?

So what's a bit strange?
 
A

Andrew Williams

Guest
A passing statement Ryan. Let's face it, I live in a free country with freedom of speech.
 

Ryan Burns

Member
Sep 23, 2016
121
21
28
37
A passing statement Ryan. Let's face it, I live in a free country with freedom of speech.
Freedom of Speech only means that the government can't stifle your speech, fwiw. At any rate, I think you mistook the tone of my response. There was no hostility in it.
 

Ryan Burns

Member
Sep 23, 2016
121
21
28
37
Surely you can express whatever thoughts you have but, in my opinion, your comment wasn't constructive at all.
I don't mind it not being constructive, I'm just confused as to what was so "strange" about me changing the picture based on new data I found.