Did Boxhall row under the propellers?

Cam Houseman

Cam Houseman

Member
Hi y'all
So did Mr. Fourth Officer Boxhall indeed pass under the Propellers?
Lifeboat No. 2 left the Portside around 1:45am, with 18 people aboard. which is near the time that the forecastle and Forward Well Deck went under (1:55-2:05am)

Day 3 (American Inquiry)

Senator SMITH.
Did you ever return to the Titanic after leaving its side?
Mr. BOXHALL.
I pulled around the ship's stern and was intending to go alongside, and tried to see if I could get alongside of the ship again.

By 2am, Boxhall has pulled around from Titanic's Port side to the Starboard side, looking for the Starboard gangway door. He then saw her Propellers rising:

"When I passed ‘round the boat to try and get to this gangway door on the Starboard side her propellers were out of water. I'm not certain if I didn't pass underneath them." (From his BBC 1962 Interview)

So does this mean he passed underneath the Starboard propellers? He must've! Either he passed very close, like, under one of the blades, or passed directly under them. Did Titanic have the Port list, or had she corrected it? According to the 2010 GHS study (AKA the physics simulation done in "Titanic: The Final Word with James Cameron" and Titanic: Honor and Glory, the Props didn't rise out of the water until the Compass Tower was under, then began to rise fast out of the water. But this was very close to 2:18, the time Titanic broke in two. I definitely think he did, before/during the bridge went under.

Thoughts?
 
Dan Parkes

Dan Parkes

Member
Yes, he did but it depends on how you interpret "under".

All four of his accounts (US Inquiry, British Inquiry, 1959 article and 1962 broadcast) are consistent regarding him departing in lifeboat no.2 on the port side and rowing around to Titanic's starboard side based on an order (possibly from Captain Smith) to "go round to the Starboard side to the gangway doors." In 1962 he admitted why he didn't completely follow through on this order: "I found that there was such a mob standing in the gangway doors, really, I daren't go alongside because if they'd jumped they'd swamp the boat."

As for seeing the propellers.... it was around 1.45am when they departed and he then "stayed round on the starboard side, probably about 200 feet away from the ship" however later he was "about a half a mile away... resting on the oars" when the Titanic sank (although he claims he did not see her sink). So when he rowed around the stern I think he kept his distance, although it may have appeared as if he went "under" them due to the angle of the ship. He was also worried about suction ("I did find there was a little suction just as I was pulling around the ship.") so would have likely kept that "200ft" he mentioned away.

You can read my compilation of his accounts: Titanic's Officers - RMS Titanic - Fourth Officer Joseph Boxhall
 
  • Like
Reactions: Manon Caillard and Cam Houseman
Cam Houseman

Cam Houseman

Member
As for seeing the propellers.... it was around 1.45am when they departed and he then "stayed round on the starboard side, probably about 200 feet away from the ship" however later he was "about a half a mile away... resting on the oars" when the Titanic sank (although he claims he did not see her sink). So when he rowed around the stern I think he kept his distance, although it may have appeared as if he went "under" them due to the angle of the ship.
You mean with the List to Port, the Starboard propeller might've seemed higher out of the air?
I mean, a higher angle seems more realistic
Also, I grabbed the 1962 interview from your website, I love it
 
Samuel Halpern

Samuel Halpern

Member
Cam, I wouldn't place too much on what Boxhall had to say in 1962.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tim Aldrich and Andy A Carter
Cam Houseman

Cam Houseman

Member
I wouldn't place too much on what he said in 1912 either!...
I read his 1912 Testimony yesterday, the only thing in my opinion that was doubtful was his testimony about the Telegraphs on the Bridge pointing at "Full Astern"
 
Samuel Halpern

Samuel Halpern

Member
How come? Was he misremembering things?
There were a number of inconsistencies if you try and compare the details. Split engine orders, where he was when the berg was sighted, are just a few. I'll leave it others to point all of them out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cam Houseman
Cam Houseman

Cam Houseman

Member
There were a number of inconsistencies if you try and compare the details. Split engine orders, where he was when the berg was sighted, are just a few. I'll leave it others to point all of them out.
Did Boxhall mention the height of the propellers above the water, or anyone in Lifeboat 2?
I'm wondering about those inconsistencies
 
J

James Murdoch

Member
Hi Cam, please watch this it is a forensic analysis in video of your exact question!


 
Arun Vajpey

Arun Vajpey

Member
Sorry to be picky. That video is certainly interesting from an analytical point of view but the narrator might have tried to be more accurate. He talks about "Second Officer" Boxhall unless I misheard.
 
J

James Murdoch

Member
Yes--I noticed that too! Interesting that it shows from Cameron's doc that lifeboat lowering took a speed of 5 ft per minute. Those first boats must have took around 15 minutes to be lowered--scary!
 
Last edited:
Ryan H

Ryan H

Member
Did Boxhall mention the height of the propellers above the water, or anyone in Lifeboat 2?
I'm wondering about those inconsistencies
I found a better video made by Shingoji about the Real Time voyage of Lifeboat 2 up till the final submerging of the stern. It is a bit dark but basely it supports my idea of Boat 2 going under the propellers of the starboard side.
As how high are the propellers from out of the water? Well, I had taken the screenshot of the moment before the lifeboat goes under the propellers and brightens it apologise for the quality of the screenshot but I hope you may understand what is happening in this screenshot.
2 AM Brighter
 
Last edited:
Top