There were some reports that an Oriental man (first erroneously described as 'Japanese' in ANTR) had tied himself to a door before he was rescued by a lifeboat. There is no definitive proof that it was that way or even that it was "Fang Lang"; being perched on top of a door might have helped for a few additional minutes, it would not have made much difference after a while.
I happen to be a retired doctor and have done some work about hypothermia related effects. So, I know very well what I am talking about. Try not to be patronizing.
Weikmann said that he saw a coil of ropes ahead of him soon after he jumped into the water; he never claimed that he had "tied a cluster of deck cahirs together"; where would anybody find the necessary time and tools to do that under those circumstances? In any case, it has already been discussed how a deck chair would be next to useless to survive under those conditions. He swam to the coil of rope and tried climbing on board but found that inactivity made the cold feeling worse so he slid back in and continueed swimming till he reached Collapsible A and was hauled on board. I am not sure where you found that "600m" information from but that's over third of a mile and there is no way Weikmann could have swum that far in icy waters. A lot of survivors greatly exaggerated the times and distances that they had spent swimming before reaching lifeboats.
As to keeping "internal organs above the water", it would have heped very little. Those wearing life vests had at least part of their torsos above water but that did not stop them from slipping into unconsciousness and dying. Those on board the waterlogged Collapsible A were knee deep in water and even there a few died; those who survived with frostbite were helped by their shared body warmth to some extent. As it was, they were lucky that Lowe found them when he did.
It is amazing how overtly confident you sound, for a person who has such a weak grasp on facts. That's how myths and lies about Titanic perpetuate, I suppose.
From Weikman's affidavit at the United States Senate Inquiry. Day 15. APRIL 24, 1912 (bold font is mine):
"I think the boilers blew up about in the middle of the ship. The explosion blew me along with a wall of water toward the dark object I was swimming to, which proved to be
a bundle of deck chairs, which I managed to climb on. While on the chairs I heard terrible groans and cries coming from people in the water. "
"Did you see the ship go down? I mean the
Titanic. Yes;
I was afloat on chairs about 100 feet away, looking toward the ship. I seen her sink."
"Did you feel any suction? No; but there was some waves come toward me caused by the ship going own, and
not enough to knock me off of the chairs."
I found this online after a 30s search. I'm away from home and don't have any sources at hand - nor time to look for them - about his paddling towards collapsible A, but feel free to search them yourself if you wish to. He conceded interviews to newspapers and there were also other people in the lifeboat who witnessed this.
As most people know, having been fully submerged in freezing water previously that night, severely reduced the chance of survival of those who ended up reaching collapsible A. They were dying left and right, even after climbing aboard. Being able to stay afloat those chairs until reaching the boat, more than likely saved Weikman's life that night, if not undoubtedly.
And I wasn't being patronising. I was just being friendly and extremely polite, given how blatantly incorrect your statements were.
Having to resort to the "argument from authority" (
argumentum ab auctoritate) fallacy in order to try and win an argument is incredibly unhelpful, besides pretentious. It's also particularly absurd when you happen to ignore the background of the people you're talking to.
And for someone who appeals to his medical background so often, you seem to lack a very scientific approach to the discovery of the truth. For reasons that escape me, you immediately presumed that you knew better than me and proceeded to instantly negate my statements without bothering to verify them first.
Also, your possible medical experience has very little relevance here; only facts matter.
Most of what we know today about the effects of hypothermia on the human body anyway we learnt it from highly unethical experiments performed on prisioners 80+ years ago, during WW2. If you happen to be privvy to some secret data so far unknown to the rest of the scientific community, I'd urge you to make it public now, for the benefit of humankind.
Last, since you already accused me of being patronising towards you anyway, I thought I'd go ahead now and encourage you to work a little on your impulsivity, among other things.