"Flying In the Face of God" A New Docu-Dramatization

Hello all! I am a long-time pursuer of ET, but a first-time poster. Like many of us, I have been into the Titanic story since the mid-1990s (before James Cameron's movie, for the record ;)).

In anticipation of the 111th aniversary of the loss of the Titanic, The Texas A&M University at Commerce Department of Theatre's New Play Development Initiative is proud to present the first of its Workshop Series: Flying In the Face of God. This archival recording of this radio play is available on SoundCloud for a limited time.

Trailer
Volume 1 (Prologue, Act I Scenes 1-6)
Volume 2 (Act I Scenes 7-12)
Volume 3 (Act II Scenes 1-12, Epilogue)

Flying In the Face of God is a ten-and-a-half-hour docu-dramatization in three volumes which weaves together twelve historical narratives of people crossing the Atlantic Ocean in pursuit of their dreams in April of 1912. Adventure becomes terror when they all find themselves unwitting players in one of history's greatest dramas.

The script is based primarily on the accounts of: Rhoda Abbott, Lawrence Beesley, Officer Joseph Boxhall, Kate Buss, Helen Candee, Minnie and Willie Coutts, Sidney Collett, Emily and Frankie Goldsmith, Archibald Gracie, Irene Harris, Esther and Eva Hart, J. Bruce Ismay, Stewardess Violet Jessop, Officer Harold Lowe, Edith Rosenbaum, Jack and Marian Thayer, Marion Wright, and Hugh Woolner.

The recording is a workshop recording meaning that the script is subject to revisions and the recording is "live" having only been edited for time, subtle rewrites, etc. The cast includes thirteen college students of the TAMUC Department of Theatre, each playing a handful of characters. For the most part, this recording was not rehearsed. Occasionally, extraneous noises can be heard on the recording.

Playwirght's Note: When I started writing this in 2014, my intention was to write a verbatim account of the disaster focusing on a handful of premonitions and what I thought were thrilling tales of survival (Edith Rosenbaum, the Harts, Archibald Gracie, etc). As I waded through the material I knew and and came to know, I discovered things that became far more interesting to me and set about sharing them. I leanred about passengers abd crew I had not considered before. Soon, twelve captivating and heartbreaking story arcs emerged about people and not just how they survived, but what they relied on to survive. And the loved ones they lost. Their stories paralleled, crossed over, ran in different directions, yet they all seemed to contain the same general messages.

We can all well appreciate that many accounts of the disaster are incomplete and contradictory and to tell this story, I made a number of choices which I felt were most appropriate based on these people's accounts and the heaps of material I found or which were made available to me. I am glad to say that this website and the many incredible people who use it proved invaluable in this process. ET and a number of the publications made available here do appear in the play's eight-page bibliography. Where possible, scenes in the play are presented verbatim or nearly verbatim. Where survivors left holes in their narratives, I have presented material which, at the very least I think is plausible and "could have happened" or which speaks to a personal truth which the historical figures expressed in life. All of the material presented has at least some context but none of it is above revision. I will be the first to admit that my understanding of events may not be the same as another's and it is not impossible that some events are presented irregularly owing to quirks of the playwrighting process or the editing process. History marches on and the script is always under revisions.

While the script will never be completely "done," I am comfortable sharing the play with you as it exists now. I hope that is generates some interesting conversation and I will be eager to hear your thoughts. The ET community is such a fantastic and unique place were so much material on a single subject resides and I am so grateful it exists. I share the work out of absolute gratitude and hope that you will appreciate the story and storytelling. You will no doubt recognize heaps of conversations from testimony and memiors, hear plenty of familiar tunes, and notice a handful of pop culture homages, all set in the context of the Titanic event and these twelve stories.

As the playwright, I am happy to answer any questions you have about how the work came to be. This recording was created for purely academic purposes as a test-run of a program we started to present new works and has not been marketed or part of any revenue-generating program. It is the product of an extracurricular group which we hope will continue and produce new works by our students and up-and-coming playwrights.

Content Warning: Disaster-related peril, violence, and death; discussions of domestic violence and suicide; and sound effects including gunshots, crashes, and explosions.
 
I believe, as any historian of the titanic tragedy, you have achieved a certain satisfaction in being able to bring these 12 stories of human lives woven into your play. For the most part, one must enjoy the effort, commitment and determination in your production, but you are absolutely right. Some of the least, reliable witnesses were the ones that were actually there, when I make presentations to neophytes, one of mine is called “separating fact from fiction.”

The world was a completely different place in 1912 there was a simplicity and innocence and strong based faith to tragedies such as this.

For example, half the witnesses say, the ship split into two and the other half determined that it went down whole… even ones in lifeboats watching from a quarter-mile away.

One thing all survivors share is the scarring in their hearts and memory, that, for the most part, lived with them the rest of their lives. Sadly, there are very few survivors that had positive outcomes to the balance of their lives.

I look forward to listening thank you for making this available.
 
Sorry...have to make a comment...as you state in your introduction that you will change your play based on facts presented.

May I suggest the very first thing is that you evaluate was the correct name of the ship.

It was RMS Titanic...not SS Titanic....yes, she was a Steam Ship, but there was also a contract between White Star and the British Government that identified her to all shipping as carrier of Royal Mail, thus allowing all ships under this agreement to bear the name Royal Mail Steamer. (RMS)

Please do share with me anything you know that could justify the identifier of SS Titanic?

Most kind regards,

Frederick
 
Hello Frederick!

Thanks for your interest in this developing piece! Regarding your first post, yes, the play is very much about stories where cold, hard facts are not available. It is their perceptions and truths (and the connections that I speculate exist if it helps the viewer/listener understand what a historic character experienced or thought) which put this somewhere outside of strict documentary, but which is also not inherently fiction. As an historian and theatre practitioner, it's an exciting, albeit dangerous, place to be.

Regarding your second post: I am going disagree with your suggestion for changing the subtitle along two grounds. In the first place, while the Titanic was awarded a contract with the Royal Mail Service and was designated RMS, that didn't remove her Steamship status and, as I'm sure you're aware, all of the signage on the ship read "SS TITANIC". In the second place, the subtitle is also a stylistic choice which nods at some of the literature published shortly after the disaster, specifically Lawrence Beesely's book and the report following the British Inquiry. Both of these texts used "SS" in their titles, as far as I have gleaned. The dialogue of the play uses many different conventions for titling the ship.

I'm excited to hear more of your thoughts!

Cade
 
Back
Top