Robert M. Himmelsbach
Guest
I've recently re-read the article on Gunshots on Board, and a thought occured to me. Mr. Lowe reported that there was a "crowd of wild Italians" or some such that had to be fended off with gunfire.
Here's where my odd thought comes in; there weren't a lot of Italians on board...among the passengers. But there were quite a few Italians among the restaurant crew.
Accepted wisdom is that the restaurant crew, cut off from the "action" by language barriers and their "neither fish nor fowl" status; neither crew nor passengers, stuck together and almost universally perished.
My thought is that perhaps a group, bound together by their common language, may have grown tired of waiting and made a rush for a lifeboat and were repelled; which would give a somewhat better explanation than the restaurant staff passively awaiting their fate, lost and forgotten.
Of course, we can never know, but this does seem a more logical possibility, to me at any rate.
Any thoughts?
Here's where my odd thought comes in; there weren't a lot of Italians on board...among the passengers. But there were quite a few Italians among the restaurant crew.
Accepted wisdom is that the restaurant crew, cut off from the "action" by language barriers and their "neither fish nor fowl" status; neither crew nor passengers, stuck together and almost universally perished.
My thought is that perhaps a group, bound together by their common language, may have grown tired of waiting and made a rush for a lifeboat and were repelled; which would give a somewhat better explanation than the restaurant staff passively awaiting their fate, lost and forgotten.
Of course, we can never know, but this does seem a more logical possibility, to me at any rate.
Any thoughts?