If this is a 'what if', it probably wouldn't change anyone's view. It was an empty ship that was not really historically significant. The only reason that anyone knows anything about it is that she was sister of the Titanic.
Well I actually like her better than Titanic but my reasons for liking Britannic better Is not because of any historic significance.I like her better because of her story,and she was a pretty cool looking ship plus It has a cool conspiracy theory which would make a cool movie.
I say she was attacked and not mined because the mine laid in October probably was destroyed by another ship or was just mine swept Im pretty sure If someone looked up records of ships running into mines in the channel before Britannic sank would make more sence.
However, I am. Matthew, we've already gone over this and you've been warned repeatedly not to continue to grind this particular axe. Speculation on what might have been is one thing. Continuing to persue something after you've been strongly warned to put a stop to it is quite another.
It stops now.
Consider that you've found the line. Don't cross it.