>>Michael--I'd be interested in what you might have to say on how I would go about turning my paper into a book. That thought positively staggers me.<<
As well that it should. This won't be the easiest thing in the world to research. Your article used a lot of secondary sources but for something that goes into the sort of depth needed for a book, you'll need to hit a lot of primary sources, as many as you can lay your hands on. I suspect that hitting up some law libraries will be essential. A good starting point would be to see what sort of proposals were put forward in the inquiries themselves then do some poking around to see what ultimately made it into the lawbooks.
Once this get's going, the whole project may end up taking on a life of it's own, and I won't kid you into thinking it's going to be accomplished quickly. Thus is a work that would take several years to finish from outline to completed work being run out to the booksellors. Some of the members here are published authors and can tell you all about that.
I think however that you may find it worthwhile.
As well that it should. This won't be the easiest thing in the world to research. Your article used a lot of secondary sources but for something that goes into the sort of depth needed for a book, you'll need to hit a lot of primary sources, as many as you can lay your hands on. I suspect that hitting up some law libraries will be essential. A good starting point would be to see what sort of proposals were put forward in the inquiries themselves then do some poking around to see what ultimately made it into the lawbooks.
Once this get's going, the whole project may end up taking on a life of it's own, and I won't kid you into thinking it's going to be accomplished quickly. Thus is a work that would take several years to finish from outline to completed work being run out to the booksellors. Some of the members here are published authors and can tell you all about that.
I think however that you may find it worthwhile.