Mrs Candee

J

Jaques

Guest
Does anyone have any idea as to what Mrs. Candee's cabin was?
Hugh Woolner mentions it in his testimony but never says the number.
I know it is either on C D or E deck, but the exact number I'm not sure of.
( You'd think Col. Gracie would have remembered)
 
Apr 16, 2001
441
1
148
My fellow researchers and I have determined that Mrs. Candee was on E-deck but we do not know which cabin she occupied.

Michael Findlay
 
J

Jaques

Guest
Maybe she was the woman in E23 mentioned by James McGough in his affadavit.
 

daniel

Member
Feb 23, 2011
5
0
31
It might, slightly be possible that Mrs Candee was the woman in E23. Mr McGough does not give a detailed description of her, simply stating that there was a "lady" in E23. Besides Mrs Candee there are 3 other likely possibilities, so therefore it is hard to judge whether she was in this cabin.

Daniel Rosenshine.
 

mark

Member
Apr 18, 2012
13
0
31
55
missouri
DOES ANYONE KNOW ABOUT MRS. CANDEE'S LIVING FAMILY TODAY? THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO ME. PLEASE HELP EMAIL ME OR REPLY HERE, I PREFER AN EMAIL. THANKS SO MUCH!!!!!!
MARK

Code:
MARK125689@AOL.COM
 
M

Mark Bray

Guest
To everyone,
Sorry about the caps. I do not want anyone to think I am yelling.

Mark
 

Mike Poirier

Member
Dec 31, 2004
1,472
0
106
Has anyone read the account on the Pellegrino website? There seems to be too much dialogue for it to be a written account. What does anyone else think?
Mike
 
Apr 26, 2005
296
0
86
I certainly think it's legitimate, because Pellegrino mentions the newspaper/magazine it was taken from and the date of the publication. So I guess everyone could verify with the magazine (if still existing) and ask a copy of the account.
 

Mike Poirier

Member
Dec 31, 2004
1,472
0
106
Actually Charles. If you read the way Pellegrino words it, the first paragraph ( which is separate from the lengthier account ) came from "Sealed Orders". The second part according to him he claims came from a relative in which she supposedly wrote a longer, more "detailed" account. That is the one I am questioning. If you go back and read it, you will see what I mean.