Hi Mark!
Thanks for your info. I'm having a real problem with this vessel. So far I have found two reports of her arriving at Halifax NS - one gives the evening of the 18th April and the other the evening of the 19th. I could not find any of her arriving at Boson MA.
Since Boston is some 383 miles to the south and if she did go to Halifax first then she would most certainly have left there for Boston some time during the 19th of April. This would also fit nicely with her reported arrival time at Halifax in the evening of April 18th.1912. However, this opens a new 'can of worms'-to me that is.
My research finds that the Allan Line SS Parisian was scheduled to begin her summer run from Glasgow to Boston in April of that year. She sailed from Glasgow on the 6th. of April, 1912 ostensibly bound for Boston - not Halifax. Her average speed is given as 14 knots.
Normally, the run to Halifax would take about 10 days with an intermediate stop in Ireland or the UK. If she were going to Halifax, she should have arrived there on the 16th - not the 18th. of April as reported. Alternately; if she was going to Boston -further from Glasgow - then she would have arrived there on the 17th. April, not the 20th. Where was she during the missing hours between 2012hrs on the 14th. April and when she arrived at Halifax?
The time of 2012 hrs is derived from the charts submitted by Captain Napp of the US Hydrographic
Office during day 17 of the US Senate Enquiry.
This suggests that 'Parisian' was indeed making for the port of Boston, not Halifax. It also suggests she altered course to pass south of the ice barrier and was just east of it at 2012 hrs.
Incidentally, the position given is a few miles ahead of where we now know 'Titanic' hit the berg.
I have no problem with anything until that point then things get a bit weird.
If Parisian was where they said she was then she should have cleared the ice shortly after midnight. This would put her south west of Titanic at that time. Half an hour or so later, Titanic started firing off her rockets.
In addition; if parisian was there, the distance to Boston is around 942.5 miles. At 14 knots and allowing for clock adjustments, she should have docked around 1700 hrs on the 17th. April.
On the other hand, if she decided to go to Halifax, the distance to there would be about 622.5 miles. At 14 knots she would have arrived there about 1800hrs on the 16th. - probably about 12 hours late due to her diversion and slow-speed ice transit. So what's the real story?
Here's one for the rest of you to chew-over:
If 'Parisian' was indeed 50 miles ahead of 'Californian' and on the same course, she would have arrived at the ice field just before sunset. Captain Napp suggests they altered course to the SW, along the eastern face of the ice. By the time of 2012 hrs, it would be getting dark and they were still to the east of the ice barrier. How were they going to find their way through it in the dark? All the other ships had decided to wait until first light. They would guess that the ice was drifting southward. This might mean that by day-break, the heavy stuff they saw to the north would be down about where they were then. They did not know how far north the pack ice extended. The further south they went, the further off their original course would be. Supposing they decided to turn NNW and slowly head back the way they came - keeping to the east of the pack ice and watching-out for bergs?
Meantime, 'Californian' was maintaining her course toward the ice. She stopped at 2230 hrs. Her mystery ship- according to the 3rd. officer came up from the SSW and stopped 4 -5 miles to the southward.
Captain Lord described one of his mystery ships as 'being much like ourselves'. Indeed, 'Parisian' with her new configuration would seem very like 'Californian' in shape and size. Lots of newspaper reporters seemed to have made the same mistake.
An additional bonus from Captain Napp was the ice reports. Many herein have suggested an element of Gulf Stream effected the vessels that night. Perhaps it did for some time after 'The Corner'. But a report from the ship 'Canada' suggests that at midnight on the 9th.April, the offending pack ice was located some 94 miles to the NNE of its midnight 14th. April position. Plotting this suggests that the Labrador current was running in a direction of 203 T. at a speed of 0.7 knots.
It might be suggested that 'Parisian' went to the aid of the tanker that was short of coal. This would take care of a few hours. But that vessel was taken in tow by the 'Asian'.
It was reported that of all those on board 'Parisian' - only Captain Harris and R/O Sutherland knew about the 'Titanic' disaster before the vessel arrived at Halifax. I find that hard to believe. However if it is true - why was that deception kept up for so long after the event?
Additionally; Captain Harris is reported to have stated that he told
Captain Smith he was 150 miles away during the distress - rubbish reporting or down-right lying? At 14 knots, 'Parisian' had to be almost 11 hours ahead of 'Titanic' at midnight on the 14th. - and that after negotiating an ice field? In fact, when Titanic sent her CQD, 'Parisian' could not have been further away than 56 miles - and that if she had maintained full speed for the previous 4 hours.
'Californian', after carrying out her search around the wreck site, arrived in Boston in the early hours of 19th. April. If 'Parisian' left the same area for Halifax around the same time then she would arrive there in the early hours of the 17th. of April.
The hours between 2230 on the night of April 14th until the early on the 19th can be accounted for in respect of the microscopically examined 'Californian' but the hours between 2012 on the 14th and the evening of the 18th relative to the movements of the 'Parisian' seem to be a mystery. Thre's a 24 hr minimum gap somewhere.
Perhaps all the work on this has already been done and I've made a simple, original mistake. If so, someone please enlighten me.
Jim