REAL SINKING PICTURE


M

Matt Endacott

Guest
Can anyone tell me if the image below is actually a REAL image of the Titanic sinking? I found it in the NEWCASTLE MORNING HERALD (Aus) a couple of years after the sinking stating it was ACTUALLY taken that night as the ship went down. There is no comment on who owns or took the pic but im pretty certain they'd be Australian, as it is an Aus paper. Can anyone tell me where it's taken from also?
78350.jpg
 

Dave Gittins

Member
Apr 11, 2001
5,045
318
353
I did a little computer enhancing and I'd say the photo was taken in daylight. You can see the ripples on the sea over a large area. There may even be land in the top righthand part. I'd say it's a boat drill on some ship and somebody is pulling the paper's leg.

There's a thread somewhere on the possibility of photos being taken during the sinking and it just wasn't on. It would have required big magnesium flashes of the type then in use and they would have been literally blindingly obvious to anybody around.

How big is the picture in the paper? A bigger photo could be enhanced to give us an even better image.
 

Bob Godfrey

Member
Nov 22, 2002
6,043
87
308
UK
Not a boat drill, unless the crew were keen enough to leap overboard. Probably a film still, but definitely not ANTR or Cameron. Best clue from a larger version would be the name on the life ring at the bottom of the pic!
 
Dec 2, 2000
58,614
692
483
Easley South Carolina
Whatever ship this was taken on, it certainly wasn't the Titanic. Compare what you see there to photos of the Titanic's and Olympic's superstructure that were known to have been taken from the stern aspect. The ladder configurations just don't match up.
 
M

Matt Endacott

Guest
I can make out a letter 'T' in the middle of the ring. Is it possible it does actually read TITANIC but made for the purpose of film? Also, is it possible this could be a still from the 1912 Titanic film with Dorothy Gibson? Although the stunts being performed seem a bit too real for the time. Maybe it's the Lusitania or Britannic going down?
Best Regards,
matt
 

Pat Cook

Member
Apr 27, 2000
1,277
5
0
Maybe I'm wrong here but if there's ANYthing written on the lifering then it DEFINITELY isn't Titanic, Olympic OR Britannic. Unless they changed their policies, the liferings were blank on those ships.

Best regards,
Cook
 

Bob Godfrey

Member
Nov 22, 2002
6,043
87
308
UK
Yes, the life rings were blank on Titanic, but I believe Olympic had the name added in the 1920s. As for this pic, Titanic it ain't, unless the iceberg effected a major redesign including general shrinkage and removal of decks! It looks like quite a small vessel, maybe even a river steamer or island ferry. Many of the men seem to be wearing shirts with the sleeves rolled up, so this was probably taken on a warm day and maybe in the tropics. The cut of the clothes looks quite modern, but the vessel a lot older.
 
Dec 6, 2000
1,384
14
221
The lifeboat being lowered doesn't quite look right to me for the Titanic. Too shallow.

The picture would have to be either forward port side, meaning this would be #2. Or stern starboard, which would be #15.
 
M

Matt Endacott

Guest
Also,
I agree. I does seem like a fake. I have also noticed if that IS the Titanic & the boat being lowered is no. 15, it was the one which rescued Lillian Asplund & her family from A DECk and it clearly shows the boat is full after being lowered from the Boat Deck.
Thanks for your help,
Matt.
 

Raymond Leggs

Member
Apr 3, 2003
84
0
86
It might be from atlantic because I saw a several film clips fom this movie from the 1997 low budget documentary the unsinkable titanic
which featured Several interveiws with our
all time favorite man Don Lynch
I have never seen the whole movie
nor the entire german film
Where can I find a copy of these
 
Jul 10, 2001
252
1
171
Hi,

my posting comes late, but here it is: I agree with Dave: this picture was taken on daylight. For "freezing" a scene in the night you need flash bulbs or that kind of magnesium powder what they have used earlier. Anyway, the effect is the same: by using a flashlight you have a bright foreground and a darker background. The farer away the objects are the darker they are. This means: we would see a bright foreground and no rescue boats in the water. The flash wouldn´t reach them. But all objects have the same light.

Second point: if the flash is mounted (or holded) close to the camera the shadows of the objects are not to be see, because for the camera they are directly behind the objects. But on the picture we can see shadows under the objects.

This picture was not taken on the Titanic.

Maybe the picture shows the rescue of passengers from the sinking of RMS Republic some years earlier? At this event there were cameras around and were used: We know of several photographs of the Republic (even close-ups) while she was sinking.

Best regards
Henning
 

Bob Godfrey

Member
Nov 22, 2002
6,043
87
308
UK
Mystery solved! The pic is indeed a film still, but it's supposed to be Lusitania, not Titanic. Lest We Forget was released in January 1918.

85052.jpg
85053.jpg
 

Similar threads

Similar threads