Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
RMS Titanic in detail
Discovery / Salvage / Exploration / Exhibits
Legal Matters including Court Proceedings
RMS Titanic Inc Sues Former Directors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Dave Tuttle, post: 237472, member: 200649"] Don't you mean the "two semi-big" pieces? So interesting that after recovery, the arguments started as to which of the two travelling exhibits would get it. Then came the rotating two-weeks alternating in each city plan. Of course, we then get told that dividing the section in two was a must for transportation concerns. But, SURPRISE!!! If you cut it in two, then each show unit gets a piece, and travel is no longer a concern at all! (That must be how they ended up with the loose porthole and frame we have currently on display in Raleigh, huh?) Best to All, Dave Tuttle "The difference between ignorance and stupidity is that ignorance can be cured." (RMSTI - take note!) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
In which year did the Titanic sail?
Post reply
Forums
RMS Titanic in detail
Discovery / Salvage / Exploration / Exhibits
Legal Matters including Court Proceedings
RMS Titanic Inc Sues Former Directors
Join us! Membership of Encyclopedia Titanica is free and gives you lots more Titanic info, and with a low annual subscription gain full access without any adverts.
Join Encyclopedia Titanica
Top