It is more with statements like this or his other ones (like we do not know how and what happened) one can came up and claim everything he likes.
Ignored your rant and reported you. I don't give a damn what you think of my research. If you don't like it, then don't read it. You can criticise the survivor accounts, but my opinion of them is off limits and the Moderator has already stated in the past that criticism against any member's opinions will not be tolerated. You have been reported 'again'.
Survivor accounts should be taken with a grain of salt if:
A) They defy the laws of physics
B) Are outliers from the majority
C) Do not match recorded facts
You say that nothing can be out ruled from the condition of the wreck, so by your logic, it is possible to say that the ship never even broke apart?
A) Defy the laws of physics - The physics are based on the flood rate and that flood rate is based on what survivors saw and how much the ship had listed. Entirely based on survivor accounts. Which is why science is secondary.
B) I believe when the survivors saw the ship turn around it was obviously in my opinion the broken stern, so any survivor who could originally see her beam before she broke might only see her keel after she broke, and vice versa, depending on where each survivor was before and after the ship broke which might also change. As this is rarely discussed we can not prove what the survivors saw was true, a lie, or simply they were mistaken. As the science follows what they say, there is a great deal of give and take regarding the survivor accounts they use when they construct their models. It is entirely up to them as to which survivors they choose to believe.
C) The recorded facts are: We are told by survivors that the ship struck an iceberg, broke in two and sank. For decades the survivors who saw her break were not believed because survivors that the public chose to believe did not mention her breaking. They had to find the wreck to prove them wrong. If the general consensus was wrong for decades, then who knows what else they got wrong. Which is why all survivor accounts should be analysed thoroughly before they can be ignored.
Nothing can be overlooked or out ruled. Every survivor account should be treated as true until proven wrong because everything we have learned from the disaster comes from survivor accounts. Hence their importance and why nothing can be overlooked.
.