Stoker sir Harry

[Caroline Mendes Ferreira]

Has a history of Sir Harry in an interview April 19, 1912. He saw a woman with two babies in her arms and grabbed one. It makes him jump with the baby while I did the same thing with another. He dived and when he returned the baby was already dead in his arms, but had to drop it.

Then he saw the woman she was swimming but there was a big explosion of boilers which caused a tidal wave that engulfed and eventually died. You've read this story.

 

[Mark Baber]

Caroline---

1. Who is it that you're referring to as "Stoker sir Harry"?

2. As Mike Standart and Bob Godfrey have mentioned in other threads, you really need to provide a better explanation of what it is you're trying to say and why.

 

[Bob Godfrey]

My guess is Henry Senior.

 

[Mark Baber]

Maybe, Bob, but we shouldn't have to guess, should we?

 

[Caroline Mendes Ferreira]

I'm sorry Mark but from what I read the name was the same

 

[Mark Baber]

the name was the same

The same as what, Caroline?

 

[Tommy]

What is the point of starting all these threads just to make a statement in it that has no question?

 

[Matteo Eyre]

I agree Tommy it's pointless if there's no question
Matteo

 

[Bob Godfrey]

A new thread doesn't need to start with a question. You might, for instance, want to start a new discussion or to pass on some new ideas or information. But the key word is new. Old ideas, old information, old discussions do not require new threads. There are plenty of existing paths through well-trodden ground.