Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Mila, post: 404199, member: 175641"]
Hi Tim.

Why are using caps and bolds?

Anyway, here's the problem.
You take some parts of the haze'sdescription provided by different witnesses and make your own haze that suits your purposes.
It is not what researchers do.

Even the quotes you provided now shows that the haze was not a mirage.
For example, one of the quotes you provided says there was haze half a  mile of the ship.
Do you really believe the horizon is half-a-mile of the ship?

Another witness said the haze was on the water. I would not described the haze on the horizon as the haze on the water.

In addition, you have completely destroyed testimonies by Fleet and Lee by providing only 
these parts that suit your narrative. For example, you "forgot" to mention
that your main witness Fleet testified that the haze was extanding only  "about was about two points on each side" 
and that your another main witness Lee testified that the haze was really heavy and all around the ship.
It is what I meant when during out email communications I told you I was disappointed in your methods of research.

BTW I believe that the haze might have been real, but it was probably sea smoke.

Why you did not respond my prior message about the smoke and the "nearby ship" Marengo?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

I which year did the Titanic sail?