Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
RMS Titanic in detail
Collision / Sinking Theories
The break up and descent
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Michael Cundiff, post: 104312, member: 143982"] Samuel: I was not even aware that Paul Mathias undertook an EOSCAN imaging of the buried port-side forward hull. Owing to collision with ice on her starboard side, scanning was endeavored on the buried portion. RMSTI/IFREMER even expressed interest in actually excavating the mud in that general area. Did the portside EOSCAN images reveal the *same* type of abrasions as did those starboard side (below mudline) images? (As seen on Discovery Channel & Susan Wel's book) I only recall above inspection of the portside forward hull. In fact P.H. Nargeolet informed George Tulloch of the *wrinkled* plating, because Tulloch was curious as to why no 30' breech as seen on the starboard side. Michael Cundiff NV, USA [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
In which year did the Titanic sail?
Post reply
Forums
RMS Titanic in detail
Collision / Sinking Theories
The break up and descent
Join us! Membership of Encyclopedia Titanica is free and gives you lots more Titanic info, and with a low annual subscription gain full access without any adverts.
Join Encyclopedia Titanica
Top