Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
RMS Titanic in detail
Collision / Sinking Theories
The break up and descent
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="David G. Brown, post: 104326, member: 136775"] The two pieces of double bottom appear to "fill in" any missing hull between the bow and stern sections. If there are any more pieces, they are quite small. It is impossible to see the tank top because the pieces are upside-down on the bottom of the sea. There seems to be some indication that the boiler beds remain in situ, although that remains to be proved. The boilers are quite a distance away from the pieces of double bottom, indicating they parted company early in the breakup -- probably near the surface. The boilers would have fallen in a relatively straight line to the sea bed, while the double bottom pieces would have somewhat "fluttered" (if you can use that term on tons of metal) down and landed at some distance away. -- David G. Brown [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
In which year did the Titanic sail?
Post reply
Forums
RMS Titanic in detail
Collision / Sinking Theories
The break up and descent
Join us! Membership of Encyclopedia Titanica is free and gives you lots more Titanic info, and with a low annual subscription gain full access without any adverts.
Join Encyclopedia Titanica
Top