N
Noel F. Jones
Member
"Having Goldberg "clear up" the matter of the sneer among legal historians is a little like having Madeleine Astor "clear up" the matter about the alleged bribes on the lifeboat or the Gordons commandeering their own lifeboat--I think the legal world will just shrug and say Goldberg is entitled to his opinion."
Apropos "styling", I would opine that within the strict protocols of the courtroom it would be entirely correct for a judge to so describe an appellant in any preamble prior to that appellant's concomitant history being brought into court.
At that stage it would remain to be seen whether the appellant's history matched up to her self-description, seeing that in the present case this was germane to the issue before the court.
It does not follow that social commentators, exercised by extraneous issues, were justified in putting a pejorative construction upon the judge's choice of words.
Noel
Apropos "styling", I would opine that within the strict protocols of the courtroom it would be entirely correct for a judge to so describe an appellant in any preamble prior to that appellant's concomitant history being brought into court.
At that stage it would remain to be seen whether the appellant's history matched up to her self-description, seeing that in the present case this was germane to the issue before the court.
It does not follow that social commentators, exercised by extraneous issues, were justified in putting a pejorative construction upon the judge's choice of words.
Noel