
Michael H. Standart
Member
>>After he was notified that Titanic would sink, I personally think he was in a state of denial. That might be why he didn't organize the officers right away.<<
I don't believe for even a second that Captain Smith was in a state of denial. He'ed been going to sea way to long and was too good at his job for that. Nor would I read too much into the much vaunted delay. The ship wasn't plunging out of control nose down after the accident so he did the prudent thing and had his people check things out, deciding on a course of action after he had a reasonably good picture of what was going on.
Bear in mind that the Titanic was no bathtub toy. It was a very large ship massing over 52,000 tonnes at full load so if something happens, that's a lot of ship to examine for the few people who were sent out. I've been trained in that sort of thing for combat operations, and with resources at my beck and call that Captain Smith couldn't even dream of. 45 minutes from collision, to damage assessment, and then preparing the boats and mustering the passengers wasn't bad for that day and age.
>>I just thought he could have warned the officers that it was serious.<<
What makes anyone think he didn't? As Dave Brown is fond of pointing out, "Beware assumptions." The claims of ignorance offered in testimony strike me as being more in the catagory, of "dash, dodge, evade and privaricate" then anything else. That they had to play it cool, dummy up, and essentially let the passengers self-select who would live and who would die may well have been the least cruddy of some really cruddy options, but you don't say things like "Natural Selection Ruled" at an official inquiry. An experienced mariner would understand it, but it doesn't follow that landsmen would.
Lifeboats are not prepared for launching and passengers mustered in midocean in the middle of the night for pranks and giggles. Boat operations are just too dangerous, and evacuation is the court of last resort. The sort of thing you do because it's the only option left or in short order is very likely to *be* the only option left.
You can be absolutely certain that Titanic's officers and crew knew this and acted accordingly.
>>About warning people to get off the ship and giving orders-well I think it would be good to do that, just not in a crazy way that Erik suggested. It would have been best to (instead of shouting out orders) just explain what was happening.<<
A hotly debated proposition to be sure. Some would agree with you too, but I wouldn't be one of them. The time to debate and explain is after the crisis passes. If the word goes out to abandon ship then it's best to do just that and ask questions later. At least you'll still be around to ask them.
I don't believe for even a second that Captain Smith was in a state of denial. He'ed been going to sea way to long and was too good at his job for that. Nor would I read too much into the much vaunted delay. The ship wasn't plunging out of control nose down after the accident so he did the prudent thing and had his people check things out, deciding on a course of action after he had a reasonably good picture of what was going on.
Bear in mind that the Titanic was no bathtub toy. It was a very large ship massing over 52,000 tonnes at full load so if something happens, that's a lot of ship to examine for the few people who were sent out. I've been trained in that sort of thing for combat operations, and with resources at my beck and call that Captain Smith couldn't even dream of. 45 minutes from collision, to damage assessment, and then preparing the boats and mustering the passengers wasn't bad for that day and age.
>>I just thought he could have warned the officers that it was serious.<<
What makes anyone think he didn't? As Dave Brown is fond of pointing out, "Beware assumptions." The claims of ignorance offered in testimony strike me as being more in the catagory, of "dash, dodge, evade and privaricate" then anything else. That they had to play it cool, dummy up, and essentially let the passengers self-select who would live and who would die may well have been the least cruddy of some really cruddy options, but you don't say things like "Natural Selection Ruled" at an official inquiry. An experienced mariner would understand it, but it doesn't follow that landsmen would.
Lifeboats are not prepared for launching and passengers mustered in midocean in the middle of the night for pranks and giggles. Boat operations are just too dangerous, and evacuation is the court of last resort. The sort of thing you do because it's the only option left or in short order is very likely to *be* the only option left.
You can be absolutely certain that Titanic's officers and crew knew this and acted accordingly.
>>About warning people to get off the ship and giving orders-well I think it would be good to do that, just not in a crazy way that Erik suggested. It would have been best to (instead of shouting out orders) just explain what was happening.<<
A hotly debated proposition to be sure. Some would agree with you too, but I wouldn't be one of them. The time to debate and explain is after the crisis passes. If the word goes out to abandon ship then it's best to do just that and ask questions later. At least you'll still be around to ask them.