>>Im talking about his daughter saying that Captain Bartlett her father's opinion that it was a torpedo that sunk the Britannic.<<
So what? We're talking about what Captain Bartlett himself actually said in his own official report. In terms of trying to get at what a given person believed about an event, regardless of whether or not that belief is accurate, I'll go with what the primary source himself said.
Captain Bartlett said he thinks a Torpedo caused the loss of the Britannic that's what his daughter said and his daughter is a blood relative.Even the crew said his opinion was that she was sunk by a Torpedo.
That train-of-thought might have been influenced by many things, but in the end it was just an opinion.
And from what Michael has stated, it is in contradiction to what the official report has Captain Bartlett listed as saying.
His daughter said he thinks the ship was torpedoed.The official report is inaccurate and of course it's not evidence to prove Britannic was torpedoed but it does prove that Captain Bartlett thinks the ship was torpedoed like his daughter said.
Clearly you know that his daughter heard him say he thinks it was torpedo as Paul Louden-Brown said so.Im talking about Captain Bartlett's opinion nothing else.Im not saying that proves it was a torpedo that sunk Britannic rather it just proves Captain Bartlett view on what sunk the vessel was a Torpedo Attack.