What sank the estonia


Status
Not open for further replies.

Tom Bates

Member
Aug 16, 2002
254
2
183
What sank the estonia a mine,torpeto,sewer gas explosion,hrink slaste,aliens,the mob,a terarest, ran agond,leakage,fuel explosion,or something top secret???? the bow door did not sink her
 
A

Andrew Johnston

Guest
The terrorist theory just doesn't work.... I did NOT run aground, no mine, no torpedo, DEFINITELY NOT aliens,,, these are theories people just make up to cause problems...

it was the bow visor letting water in simply, as the securing processes were once again not done properly... its obvious considering how often this happens...
 
Jul 9, 2000
58,666
881
563
Easley South Carolina
>>the bow door did not sink her .<<

Eh??? Sez who? The accident that happened here was hauntingly close to what happened to the Harald Of Free Enterprise in that the door came off, water flooded in, and free surface action did the rest.
 
M

Mike Anderson

Guest
Since the links on that site don't seem to be working, here's the link to the final report:

http://www.onnettomuustutkinta.fi/estonia/

Agree with it or not, there's a lot of valuable information in the form of crew testimony as well as complete deckplans. There's also some slightly obscure interior photos; good for trying to get a sense of what the survivors had to do to get up to 7 Deck.

I myself don't go for the conspiracy theories, but the "gravel/sand pile" photos and "wax paper package" photos do raise a bit of doubt.
 
Jul 9, 2000
58,666
881
563
Easley South Carolina
>>but the "gravel/sand pile" photos and "wax paper package" photos do raise a bit of doubt.<<

That or the authorities with the jurisdiction and the parties with the vested interests are loath to admit that their ship was killed by a simple design flaw or defects due to improper maintainance. It's not like this would be the first time something like that happened. No need to look for the remarkable when the culprit is the mundane.
 
M

Mike Anderson

Guest
Right, in the end, the obvious conclusion is that a lack of seaworthiness sunk the ship. Granted, it's been said one of the countries involved had exempted the Estonia from some SOLAS requirements, but I don't know the specifics of it. Motivation, I suppose, for the more mundane conspiracy theorists.

Anyway, here's some links that I probably should have linked to before:

http://www.factgroup.nu/est/hole_00.html - Regarding sand fill.

http://www.onnettomuustutkinta.fi/estonia/chapt02.html#2 - Regarding ownership history. (Interesting to note that the Swedish role in the Estonia's operation had more to do with finances of Estline than the actual physical running of the ferry.)

http://www.factgroup.nu/est/ramp96_00.html - Regarding photos taken by the Bemis expedition.

The "Indepedent Fact Group" pages should probably be taken with a grain of salt, but they're interesting, nonetheless.
 
Jul 9, 2000
58,666
881
563
Easley South Carolina
I would explain it as the usual confusion that happens in the wake of such events. Much the same happened with Titanic as the authorities tried to compile a list of those who survived as opposed to those who were lost, and inaccurate reporting based on rumours, innuendo, claims from imposters, and outright lies didn't help the situation. More of the same thing happened in the wake of the 9-11 attacks. (Anyone remember the hysterical stories that the government had supposedly blown up the Pentegon with a truck bomb? These stories conveniently left out information on how aircraft behave when they crash!)

That article offers a lot of insinuations, but really, what's new about that? Some of the claims may be factully correct in and of themselves, but do they tell the whole story? I wouldn't count on it. Conspiracy theories find a fertile breeding ground among people who suspect the worst and who are given only part of the story while other rather awkward facts are left out.

Sorry Tom, but there's nothing new here. Just more of the same old thing.
 
Jul 11, 2001
547
6
183
I am guessing this is about the Discovery Channels feature about the last attempt to dive on the wreck. It did seem odd that the authorities tried to prevent an independant research team from sending down a film crew. Plus the underwater pictures showing explosion damage on the hull. Combined with the fact that the Goverment tried to bury the entire ship in sand and gravel. The Bow door coming off story sure sounds like a good cover story. But much like the Kennedy assasination, the truth will probably never be known.
 
Jul 9, 2000
58,666
881
563
Easley South Carolina
Only when did the hull take this damage? At the time she sank, or was there a later attempt to demolish the hull? This assumes that the assessment of explosion damage is correct. Hardly a given. David, the "truth" (There's a slippery term for you!) whatever that is, may never be known, but I don't subscribe to grand conspiracy theories. They seldom hold up well under close examination.

If the authorities are trying to cover anything up, my bet would be on a design defect with that door. It's entirely plausible considering what's known to happen when thousands of tons of water suddenly makes it's way into the vehicle deck. Instablity sets in, boyancy goes to hell in a handbasket, goodbye cruel world, hello Davy Jones Locker! (Remarkable and all too predictable sequence of cause and effect there since it had happened befor!
wink.gif
)

An encore performance of The Harald of Free Enterprise accident wasn't the sort of thing that was supposed to happen, yet the Estonia was compelling evidence that it did. If somebody didn't take the lesson to heart, they would scarcely be eager to advertise the fact, would they??? Not with Ghengis Attorney and Attila the Lawyer ready and waiting in the wings to hit them with a lawsuit that would put the line in bankruptcy court.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Similar threads