Why was Olympic painted white and then changed

My understanding is this was done solely to improve the contrast of the hull against the dark gantry for photgraphic purposes. That way, the lines of the hull were sure to be recorded on film. There was no need to do the same for the second and third hulls of the class.

Parks
 
Yes, I agree with Dan and Parks.

Often, important ships and the first of a class were white painted, especially for photographs. One example was the Oceanic of 1899, dubbed ‘the ship of the century.’

But black was used for hulls at the time when ships were in service, for practical necessity; among other things, corrosion caused by the sea air was much less noticeable on a black hull. Coal also made dirty marks on a white hull and didn’t show-up on a black one.

Photographs of the third sister painted white while serving as a hospital ship demonstrate this; the rust and coal dust show-up obviously. People sometimes refer to Britannic as a ‘rust bucket,’ but if you removed the black paint and camouflage from other liners of the time, they would look just as bad, if not worse.

Later, after oil-firing had been introduced to the liners, it was possible for white-painted hulls to be applied; Mauretania was given a white hull in the early 1930s when she was used for cruising, but there was still the problem of rust.

Best regards,

Mark.
 
Did you ever see the Olympic in wartime dazzle paint with the nifty zigzags? Shades of grey and white- fabulous! I have a postcard of Britannic on the stocks in grey hull- nothing beats the black hull and gold stripe with white superstructure though!
 
Shelley,

I've seen photos of Olympic in her wartime camouflage; in fact, much of it was changed at various points during the war and some sources say it was altered at least four times! Some of the photos of her I purchased from the Imperial War Museum, and I have a colour postcard too. I am not sure if the postcard is accurate and I'm unsure of the exact colours offhand, I'll have to check this out.

Best regards,

Mark.
 
Parks,

Good point! Light grey or white.

In fact, if memory serves, Mauretania and Aquitania were also painted a greyish (slightly darker in their cases) at their launchings, but Lusitania was painted black. I'm no expert on those ships, though.

Best regards,

Mark.
 
The photograph I have of the Aquatania at launch appears to be a very light grey. I have several of the Mauritania as well...thanks to the reprints of the Shipbuilder articals...which show the ship painted in much the same way.

Cordially,
Michael H. Standart
 
Yep- Titanic was the only one launched with the black hull- Olympic was very light gray- rusty red below the waterline, Britannic started off grey, then was painted up for hospital ship duty.
 
Parks,

All of the sources I have seen about Britannic's launch, including a newspaper article that I researched, described her hull as a dark grey. Where did the black colour information come from? I think the confusion is that this dark grey can look very close to black, especially in the old photographs. But if you compare some of them closely, there's a difference.

Regards,

Mark.
 
Back
Top