Manuel Reiprich
Member
Hello all!
In older titanic books (Titanic: An Illustrated History; Triumph and Tragedy etc.) the number of people rescued in every lifeboat is often much higher than the "new", more correct numbers here on this side (determined by Peter Engberg Klarström). ( We all know the "old" numbers, for example Boat 14 with 60 people (in fact: 40), D with 44(in fact: 25), 2 with 25(in fact:18), 10 with 50(in fact: 30)).
Why were these numbers not corrected earlier?
IMO, it was very easy to realize that the older numbers were wrong. If the authors would have added up the several numbers, they would have realized that they were to high (around 830 instead of 712 survivors).
Why didn't they adapt the wrong numbers on the real number of survivors?
Did they assume that some people dropped out or died in the boats? Over 100 people?
That sounds ridiculous.
Cordially
Manuel Reiprich
In older titanic books (Titanic: An Illustrated History; Triumph and Tragedy etc.) the number of people rescued in every lifeboat is often much higher than the "new", more correct numbers here on this side (determined by Peter Engberg Klarström). ( We all know the "old" numbers, for example Boat 14 with 60 people (in fact: 40), D with 44(in fact: 25), 2 with 25(in fact:18), 10 with 50(in fact: 30)).
Why were these numbers not corrected earlier?
IMO, it was very easy to realize that the older numbers were wrong. If the authors would have added up the several numbers, they would have realized that they were to high (around 830 instead of 712 survivors).
Why didn't they adapt the wrong numbers on the real number of survivors?
Did they assume that some people dropped out or died in the boats? Over 100 people?
That sounds ridiculous.
Cordially
Manuel Reiprich