taner tanriover
Guest
Let's assume Lord and crew were absolutely honest in their statements. We still have the business of determining who that nearby mystery ship was that [insert name here] tried morsing with torchlight? Let's suppose 'twas not Californian [despite historically being the biggest -and just about the only serious- suspect] but say ship X, captained by some guy called X.
Most of what I've had to say about Lord also apply to Cpt. X and crew.
Ship X couldn't help because, being so close to the disaster and [most probly] having had first hand knowledge of the fact that it was a consequence of human error rather than a natural occurence, were too busy discussing whether they should, or just simply too scared of the potential risx a rescue effort involved.
Let's face it: There just WAS a ship close by. These people couldn't have been trying to send torchlight signals to some ship that may have been 12-20 miles away. All that remains a mystery is whether this ship was the Californian or not.
And when I say human error, I mean, building a ship that size when it was not clear whether things happened at random or not and sailing it with little regard to safety was a deadly mistake to begin with, nevermind sinking it thru a collision with an iceberg after ignoring specific warnings.
All these people who oh so popularly demanded that my previous thread is closed. Since you are so convinced that it was not Californian please shed some light on the identity of Ship X. And please don't bother write in to say it could have been a star or something. That's just baloney. According to a dozen or so Titanic statements there was a ship close by. And all statements by the crew of Californian deny that this could have been them.
To me it's pretty clear that only one of these parties could have been truthful.
And also pretty clear which one.
Because my version of events make sense.
Lord's don't.
"What goes around comes around. What did you think it was a joke when we told you there was ice here? It's our turn to pretend your CQDs are sent in good humor, then."
one guy disregards warnings
one does not respond to distress calls
story of my life
tell me about it
---
I bought a couple of boox on Titanic today, namely The Senate Hearings, and a paperback that compiles 4 survivor stories including Gracie and Beesley's.
Gracie, whose version I'd read before and find accurate and unbiased, sounds almost convinced Californian was lying:
"[...] it was not chance but the grossest negligence alone which sealed the fate of all the noble lives, men and women, that were lost. [...] the Captain of the Californian and his crew were watching our lights from the deck of their ship, which remained approximately stationary until 5.15 am [...] When we realised that the ship whose lights we saw was not coming towards us, our hopes of rescue were correspondingly depressed."
a whole lot of lifeboat survivors' and Titanic crew testimonies verify Gracie's accusations. What reason did these people have to lie about seeing the lights of a ship? None. What reason did Lord and crew have to lie? Endless.
Lord's testimony, which maintains he was 20 miles or so away at all times is pure rubbish. According to some accounts he was told as many as times 5 times about the rockets but didn't react. Gracie claims Californian was as close as 4-5 miles around midnight.
Californian's story couldn't have been true. Lord sounds like he was lying but he sure doesn't sound like a grade A moron who couldn't have figured that a ship repeatedly firing rockets at wee hours of the morning, in a treacherous region of the ocean was in distress. Especially [according to Evans' account] he well knew that that ship could have been no other than the Titanic. [LORD: "The only passenger steamer near us is the Titanic."]
Most of what I've had to say about Lord also apply to Cpt. X and crew.
Ship X couldn't help because, being so close to the disaster and [most probly] having had first hand knowledge of the fact that it was a consequence of human error rather than a natural occurence, were too busy discussing whether they should, or just simply too scared of the potential risx a rescue effort involved.
Let's face it: There just WAS a ship close by. These people couldn't have been trying to send torchlight signals to some ship that may have been 12-20 miles away. All that remains a mystery is whether this ship was the Californian or not.
And when I say human error, I mean, building a ship that size when it was not clear whether things happened at random or not and sailing it with little regard to safety was a deadly mistake to begin with, nevermind sinking it thru a collision with an iceberg after ignoring specific warnings.
All these people who oh so popularly demanded that my previous thread is closed. Since you are so convinced that it was not Californian please shed some light on the identity of Ship X. And please don't bother write in to say it could have been a star or something. That's just baloney. According to a dozen or so Titanic statements there was a ship close by. And all statements by the crew of Californian deny that this could have been them.
To me it's pretty clear that only one of these parties could have been truthful.
And also pretty clear which one.
Because my version of events make sense.
Lord's don't.
"What goes around comes around. What did you think it was a joke when we told you there was ice here? It's our turn to pretend your CQDs are sent in good humor, then."
one guy disregards warnings
one does not respond to distress calls
story of my life
tell me about it
---
I bought a couple of boox on Titanic today, namely The Senate Hearings, and a paperback that compiles 4 survivor stories including Gracie and Beesley's.
Gracie, whose version I'd read before and find accurate and unbiased, sounds almost convinced Californian was lying:
"[...] it was not chance but the grossest negligence alone which sealed the fate of all the noble lives, men and women, that were lost. [...] the Captain of the Californian and his crew were watching our lights from the deck of their ship, which remained approximately stationary until 5.15 am [...] When we realised that the ship whose lights we saw was not coming towards us, our hopes of rescue were correspondingly depressed."
a whole lot of lifeboat survivors' and Titanic crew testimonies verify Gracie's accusations. What reason did these people have to lie about seeing the lights of a ship? None. What reason did Lord and crew have to lie? Endless.
Lord's testimony, which maintains he was 20 miles or so away at all times is pure rubbish. According to some accounts he was told as many as times 5 times about the rockets but didn't react. Gracie claims Californian was as close as 4-5 miles around midnight.
Californian's story couldn't have been true. Lord sounds like he was lying but he sure doesn't sound like a grade A moron who couldn't have figured that a ship repeatedly firing rockets at wee hours of the morning, in a treacherous region of the ocean was in distress. Especially [according to Evans' account] he well knew that that ship could have been no other than the Titanic. [LORD: "The only passenger steamer near us is the Titanic."]