Encyclopedia Titanica

Titanic Fire & Ice (Or What You Will)

   Join Us and Hide Ads

This article critically examines the claims regarding a coal bunker fire made in the 2017 television program “Titanic: The New Evidence.”

by Bruce Beveridge, Mark Chirnside, Tad Fitch, Ioannis Georgiou, Steve Hall, J. Kent Layton & Bill Wormstedt
Key Points

  1. Introduction:

    • The program claimed that new photographic evidence showed severe hull damage from a coal bunker fire on the Titanic.
    • The authors aim to correct historical inaccuracies presented in the program.
  2. The Claims:

    • Smudge and Location: The program suggested a smudge on the Titanic’s hull indicated damage from a coal bunker fire.
    • The Fire: It was claimed that a fire in a coal bunker weakened the hull, contributing to the disaster.
    • Financial Pressures: The program alleged that financial pressures led to substandard construction of the Titanic.
    • Withholding Information: It was suggested that the fire was kept secret from passengers and that the ship sailed despite the fire.
    • Covering Up the Fire: The program claimed that the British Inquiry covered up the fire’s significance.
    • Spreading Fire: It was alleged that the fire spread and worsened during the voyage.
    • Coal Shortage: The program claimed the Titanic was short of coal, influencing decisions to maintain speed.
    • Thomas Andrews’ Belief: It was suggested that Andrews initially believed the ship would survive.
    • Fire’s Final Role: The program claimed the fire-damaged bulkhead gave way, causing the ship to sink faster.
    • Culture of Coverup: The program alleged a culture of coverup within the White Star Line.
  3. The Facts:

    • Smudge and Location: The smudge was not evidence of hull damage; it was likely a photographic artifact.
    • The Fire: The fire was not as severe as claimed and was extinguished before the collision.
    • Financial Pressures: There is no evidence that financial pressures led to substandard construction.
    • Withholding Information: Coal bunker fires were not uncommon, and the fire was not considered serious enough to inform passengers.
    • Covering Up the Fire: The British Inquiry did discuss the fire, and there was no coverup.
    • Spreading Fire: The fire did not spread or worsen; it was contained and extinguished.
    • Coal Shortage: The Titanic had sufficient coal reserves for the voyage.
    • Thomas Andrews’ Belief: Andrews knew the ship was doomed shortly after the collision.
    • Fire’s Final Role: The bulkhead did not fail due to the fire; the ship was doomed from the collision.
    • Culture of Coverup: There is no evidence of a coverup; the use of code words like “YAMSI” was routine.
  4. Conclusion:

    • The coal bunker fire did not play a significant role in the Titanic disaster.
    • The program’s claims are not supported by historical evidence.
    • The authors emphasize the importance of accurate historical representation.

About Research References on Encyclopedia Titanica
This item is not available to read on Encyclopedia Titanica, but we have included it as a reference and provided a brief summary of the key points to help readers interested in the finer details of the Titanic story.

Unfortunately we can't provide a current location for this resource, contact us for further details.

Find Related Items

Coal Bunker Fire

Contribute

  Get in touch