Encyclopedia Titanica

The tugs at Titanic's Departure

Titanica!

   Join Us and Hide Ads
The tugs at Titanic's Departure

Albert Edward, Hercules, Vulcan, Ajax, Hector Neptune

Tug guiding Titanic

Registered 10 September 1861, the Southampton, Isle of Wight and South of England Royal Mail Steam Packet Limited Company was known during its early years as “The Isle of Wight Company”. The new company was formed from two existing firms: The Isle of Wight Steam Packet Company, with offices at Southampton, and the Isle of Wight Royal Mail Steam Packet Company, based at Cowes, Isle of Wight.

The combined resources of the new company consisted of seven paddle steamers of between 64 and 104 gross tons that plied the passenger and freight-carrying route between Southampton and the Isle of Wight. Perhaps because of its somewhat unwieldy name, the company became eventually known as the Red Funnel Line, a name it still holds today.

Four of the company’s vessels were named: Ruby, Sapphire, Emerald and Pearl. Their names were incorporated in the colours of the company’s house flag formed by four triangles coloured blue, red, green and white, respectively.

Eventually, the line’s services expanded to include excursion routes between Southampton and ports along the English Channel from Brighton to Dartmouth. There was at one time, a twice-weekly round trip across the channel to Cherbourg, France. There was a tug and towage operation. The company provided tender services for passengers and luggage to and from vessels anchored off Cowes or Ryde on the Isle of Wight.

Around 1886 the company acquired the Southampton Steam Towing Company and with it, three vessels which worked routes and provided tug and towage services. To these were soon added (up to 1910), Albert Edward (1886), Hercules (1889), Vulcan (1893), Ajax (1894), Hector (1903) and Neptune (1910). To this day the Southampton Isle of Wight and South of England Royal Mail Steam Packet Limited Company operates out of its Southampton office the services begun more than 140 years ago.

But it is the six vessels from its fleet we now consider; the six tugs which assisted the Titanic when she departed Southampton on her maiden voyage 10 April 1912, two of which helped the departing liner avert an emergency that might have well have caused a cancellation of the sailing date and delayed the start of her maiden voyage.

Tug recovers the New York
Wednesday, 10 April 1912, 12:15 p.m.

Albert Edward

  • Port of Registry: Southampton
  • Flag of Registry: British
  • Funnel: Red with black top
  • Company flag: Divided by crossed lines into four equal triangles: Blue at hoist, white top, green at fly, red at bottom
  • Signal letters: H J C M Iron hull, one funnel, two screws, one deck, sloop rigEngines: Compound, 4 cyc. 17” 32 x 24” stroke, 1100 h.p.
  • Tonnages: Gross 160 Underdeck 149 Net 100
  • Dimensions: Length 120 ft. Width 20.1 ft. Depth 9.6 ft.
1886 Built and engined by Day, Summers & Co., Ltd. Northam, Devon Yard No. 77
1886 5 June launched
1898 New boilers
1899 Worked war cargo at the French ports of St. Nazaire, later LeHavre
1900 Returned to company service
1901 Chartered to Sark Motor Ships, Ltd. Used for Channel Island transport and excursions
1934 Renamed Joy Bell III
1938 Sold to Sark Island Motor Ships, Ltd.
1940 Escaped when Germans occupied the Channel Islands. Returned to Southampton, taken over by Admiralty and used as barrage balloon tender.
1944 Converted to a mooring and salvage vessel for the Ministry of Transport
1947 Renamed Rafmoor, re-registered and transferred to Air Ministry
1952 June, Transferred to Weymouth for permanent basing
1961 Jan Broken up at Grimsby

Hercules

Port of Registry: Southampton
Flag of Registry: British
Funnel: Red, black top
Company Flag: Divided by crossed lines into four equal trianges, blue at hoist, white at top, green at fly , red at bottom.
Signal Letters: L W N Y
Steel hull, one funnel, two screws, one deck, smack rig.
Engines:
Triple expansion, 6 cyl. 2 each: 15’x 24”, 39” x 28” stroke, 1,200 h.p.
Tonnages: Gross-234 Underdeck 232 Net 41
Dimensions: Length 135.5 ft. Width 24.1 ft. Depth 11.0 ft.

1889 Built and engined by Barclay, Curle & Co., Ltd. Glasgow, yard no. 366
1889 Sept 11 Launched
1889 Nov. 12 Trials
1903 New boilers
1914-18 Worked war cargo at the French ports of St. Nazaire then later LeHavre
1926 Broken up by Pollack, Brown, Southampton.


Vulcan

One of two tugs that threw lines aboard New York, keeping her from striking Titanic as the latter, while leaving the dock at Southampton, pulled the New York toward her.

Port of registry: Southampton
Flag of registry: British
Funnel: Red with black top
Company flag: Divided by crossed lines into four equal triangles Blue at hoist, white at top, green at fly, red at bottom
Signal letters: S P H C
Steel hull, one funnel, two screws, one deck
Engines: triple expansion, 6 cyl. 2 each: 15”, 24” 39” x 28” stroke, 1,200 h.p.
Tonnages: Gross 288 Underdeck 239
Dimensions: Length 120.0 ft. Width 25.1 ft. Depth 11.8 ft.

1893: Built and engineered by Barclay, Curle, & Co., Ltd. Glasgow, yard no. 383
1893: Mar. 4 Launched
1911: Sept. 20 Southampton: Assisted Olympic after a collision with cruiser Hawke in the Solent
1916-18: Worked war cargo at French ports, returned to service after the war
1927: Scrapped at Milford Haven


Ajax

Call letters: S P G B
Port of Registry: Southampton
Flag of Registry: British
Funnel: Red, black top
Company flag: Divided by crossed lines into four equal triangles, blue at hoist, white at top, green at fly, red at bottom
Steel hull, one funnel, two screws, one deck, smack rig
Engines: compound, 4 cyl. 2 each 18”. 36 “ x 27” stroke; 1,200 h.p.
Tonnage: Gross 273 Underdeck 231 Net 4
Dimensions: Length 120 ft. Width 25 ft. Depth 11.5

1894 Built and engineered by Barclay, Curle & Co., Lts. Glasgow, Yard No. 393
1894 Oct. 18 Launched
1914-18 Requisitioned for war service, returned to company service after the war
1936 Dec. Towed to Holland for breaking up


Hector

Port of Registry: Southampton
Flag of Registry: British
Funnel: Red, black top
Company flag: Divided by crossed lines into four equal triangles
Blue at hoist, white at top, green at fly, red at bottom
Signal letters: V D J M
Steel hull, one funnel, two screws, one deck, cutter rig,
Engines: compound, 4 cyl. 2 each 19”, 38” x 30” stroke, 1,200 h.p
Tonnage: Gross 316 Underdeck 278
Dimensions: Length 129.5 ft. Width 25.1 ft. Depth 11.9 ft.

1903: Built and engined by Day, Summers & Co. Ltd. Northam, Devon yard no. 131
1903 Launched
1958 Towed to Holland for breaking up.


Neptune

Port of Registry: Southampton
Flag of Registry: British
Funnel: Red, black top
Company flag: Divided by crossed lines into four equal triangles. Blue at hoist, white at top, green at fly, red at bottom
Signal letters: J B K C
Steel hull, one funnel, two screws, one deck
Engines: compound, 4 cyl. 2 each: 19”, 38” x 30” stroke, 1,400 h.p.
Tonnage: Gross 314 Underdeck 278 Net 3
Dimensions: Length 130 ft. Width 25 ft. Depth 11.9 ft.

1910 Built and engined by Day, Summers, and Co. Ltd. Northam, Devon Yard No. 145
1910 Launched
1961 April, sold.


This item first appeared in Voyage, Journal of the Titanic International Society.

Contributors

Shelley Dziedzic, USA

Comment and discuss

  1. chrisd chrisd
    Thank you all for your replies.I was expecting and understand the authenticity doubters and faked items response and fully appreciate that some 99.9% of Titanic related items are either memorabilia, copies or fakes. I do have years of experience in collecting and studying and comparing ancient, antique and faked items (including the stratigraphy and faking of patinas) and as I said have no doubt as to the age and authenticity of this item.If someone was going to fake a wheel from a steam tug that served Titanic, the only sustainable reason being to profit, they would use the name of a tug recorded to have carried out that task and known to have since been dismantled, rather than using an unknown name which has no recorded connection to the ship, which would make no sense.Regarding the comprehensiveness of the H & W lists I read somwhere that those published are not necessarily comprehensive, and in any case have suggested that the tug may have been built by another company. I have managed to contact Daniel in America, who has confirmed that, whilst he wrote the post 15 years ago, he does specifically remember reading about the tug Samson aiding Titanic. So for me this remains a mystery.Kind regardsChris
  2. Seumas Seumas
    You'll need much, much better proof than that. It's not at all convincing.Let's see this bloke's sources and not just what he thinks he remembers. And it doesn't get around the fact that the names of the six tugs have been established for a long time. The "Samson" was not one of them.
  3. chrisd chrisd
    This was not supposed to be an argument. It was supposed to be an enquiry to see if anyone had heard of the Samson, as simple as that.I was not inviting opinionated know-all views constrained by known records - unless of course one was there on 10th April 1912 to witness the names of all the tugs that day in the Solent.I had hoped this forum would be one of positive inquisitive attitudes, amongst other things interested in unrecorded and unknown information, with open minds about things that may or may not have been recorded or happened in 1912 long before our time. It seems pointless and I shall not continue with this thread but will continue research on the matter through learned circles. As a closing point I am intrigued by Stewart Halls comment "Are the tugboat nameplates blotted out intentionally in the original film footage". Having reviewed numerous pictures of the tugboats in action that day very few of them show the names of the tugs and on those that do most are not legible....
  4. Ioannis Georgiou Ioannis Georgiou
    Thank you Ioannis Georgiou for your interest in my posting on March 4th and apologies for the delay in getting back to this forum.You are welcome![QUOTE="chrisd, post: 445509, member: 147426"]You ask what is the evidence. This falls into two categories as follows:1. A blog for 'Titanic Station' ([URL="https://titanicstation.blogspot.com"]Titanic Station[/URL] posted )on Monday 27th October 2008 titled 'Titanic's Departure' which referred to the near collison of Titanic with the SS New York and stated that:"Two tugs (Samson and Hercules) were able to hold the New York back". The person who wrote the blog (Daniel, location Clute, Texas, USA) claims to have got a lot of information from books about Titanic, but I do not know where the original reference to a Samson tug may have came from.Yes sadly no source is given here. However after a quick look over that part "Titanic’s Departure" there seems to be a lot of wrong information posted there.For example "Collision mats were hung over the side of the Titanic to soften any collision that might happen."That is not right. There were no "mats" aboard Titanic. Actually according to 2nd class passenger Lawerence Beesley mats were put over the side of the New York. Sadly we see the same mistake here with the tugs. According to that link it continues: "Two tugs (Samson and Hercules) were able to hold the New York back." Aside that there was no tug called Samson it was the tug Vulcan which
View 34 comments... Open Thread Leave a Reply

Contribute

  Get in touch

Citation

Encyclopedia Titanica (2005) The tugs at Titanic's Departure (Titanica!, ref: #4444, published 6 February 2005, generated 4th December 2024 07:03:39 PM); URL : https://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/titanic-tugs.html