Encyclopedia Titanica

Titanic: Why she collided, why she sank, why she should never have sailed

A fascinating insight into White Star Line’s conduct following the loss of their prize vessel “Titanic”

Titanic Review

    Hide Ads

Book CoverSenan Molony presents a fascinating insight into White Star Line’s conduct following the loss of their prize vessel “Titanic”. In his opinion, the ship should never have been allowed to sail whilst in such an unsafe condition.

It is a now accepted fact that “Titanic” was unfinished before sailing, a number of second and third class cabins were unfinished, sections of the ship were still being painted and many were experiencing problems with heating, so much so, that some passengers simply remained in bed to keep warm! The author states that workmen were still onboard even after the Southampton departure, and were taken off by another vessel en route to Cherbourg

What the author bases this book on, though, is the fact that she was allowed to commence her maiden voyage with a serious fire in a coal bunker. However, it is known that many ships left port with such fires burning, the question here is was it an “Inferno” as claimed by one witness, or “Smouldering” as claimed by another?

Mr Molony provides evidence that the fire was already burning before the ship departed Belfast for Southampton, yet nothing appears to have been done about it, had it been a serious fire, it should have been reported to the Board of Trade, but this never happened, and it was only following her Southampton departure that it was taken seriously.

We are left to decide for ourselves whether this “Inferno” or “Smouldering” fire caused a weakness in a bulkhead, or even if the metal bulkheads were sufficiently thick. Another suggested factor claimed by the author is the poor quality of the coal used owing to the ongoing coal strike. The usual top quality Welsh coal was unavailable, and the shipping line was forced to scavenge leftover coal from other ships in port.

What is truly startling, however, is that of the dozens of firemen, stokers etc. who brought the ship from Belfast, some 95.6% left the ship in Southampton. Surely this is an incredibly high percentage? Why was this? Were they unhappy about trusting their luck to a ship which could likely catch fire mid-Atlantic?

The author also makes the point that the “Rules of the road” were, as now, that when meeting another ship or obstruction, to pass starboard to starboard. Officers would have that edict ingrained in their psyche, yet at the last moment she swung to port to pass, which is why she struck the berg on the starboard side. Had she turned to port immediately, there is a strong chance that the iceberg could have been missed altogether.

One minor irritation for this reviewer is the number of premonitions quoted in the book. Every maritime disaster is rife with them; London (1866) Waratah (1909) Empress of Ireland (1914).

The reader will have to make up their own mind regarding the plethora of post sinking correspondence from the White Star Line and others, Mr Molony has certainly supplied plenty of it and much of it would seem to be suggestive of a cover-up.

Overall, this nicely illustrated book is certainly one to give cause for thought. The reader will disagree with some points, but from others there is no escape.

It is a well researched and easy to read book which I thoroughly recommend the serious “Titanic” researcher to add to their library.

Stoker
A fireman at work in the bunkers of a transatlantic liner.
SS Cairnrona
The Cairnrona which also put to sea with a coal bunker fire with devastating results.

Geoff Whitfield
April 2019.

Titanic Why she collided, Why she sank, Why she should never have sailed
Published by Mercier Press : ISBN: 9781781176375

Contributors

Geoff Whitfield, UK

Contribute

  Send New Information

Comment and discuss

  1. Rob Lawes

    Rob Lawes said:

    Thumbing through the online news this morning I stumbled across this item. New book claims little-known safety rule may have doomed the Titanic and the 1,500 on board | Daily Mail Online I don't think I need to say too much more. :confused:

  2. Steven Christian

    Steven Christian said:

    Well the article did have some nice pictures. Other than that...o_O

  3. mitfrc

    mitfrc said:

    I've noticed that Mr. Molony seems to think that Englishmen seem to have a complete inability to display initiative like they're all junior officers under Darth Vader. I guess all those hundreds of times each year that British vessels are traveling along a coast to their right and turn into the beach and run aground according to the rules of the road prove he's right... Oh, wait...

  4. Mila

    Mila said:

    Mr Molony continues: 'Titanic said she made only one manouevre. But she likely actually made two. And they were contradictory. Costing the whole ship and all aboard.' Titanic said?

  5. Samuel Halpern

    Samuel Halpern said:

    Some people would do or write just about anything to make a buck. Molony has been known to write fiction before.

  6. Rob Lawes

    Rob Lawes said:

    This is what happens when you stop putting your work forward for peer review and have the ability to access a publisher to push out whatever you like. Even those (including myself) with a relatively broad and shallow knowledge of Titanic knew about the bunker fire years before the "new evidence" documentary. It must be the case of the first documentary in history to have been thoroughly debunked before it was released on the world.

  7. Steven Christian

    Steven Christian said:

    Yes. I was really disappointed with that documentary. You think if your going to put out a theory like that you could at least find a picture with the "smudge" in the right spot. But maybe I'm just asking too much.

  8. Samuel Halpern

    Samuel Halpern said:

    Why let facts get in the way of a good story?

  9. Seungho Kang

    Seungho Kang said:

    Why are people so attracted to these conspiracy theories? It doesnt mean anything other than the article attracting views.

  10. Brad Rousse

    Brad Rousse said:

    Conspiracy theories are seductive: they are built on the premise of secret knowledge. You're too smart and too clever to be fooled by Them, because unlike all these other fools you KNOW the Titanic was actually the Olympic; that Bush blew up the Twin Towers; that Earth is flat; that the Moon landings were all filmed on a studio... all you have to do is watch a few videos on YouTube and you've taken the red pill.

  11. Steven Christian

    Steven Christian said:

    And they sell a lot of books. I've looked up authors before and some thats all they write about. Not just one conspiracy but damn near every conspiracy. Its their bread and butter.

  12. Mila

    Mila said:

    A few years ago I put a video of a ship disappearing behind the horizon on YouTube. Little did I know about these conspiracy theories. I have stopped responding and removing comments [MEDIA=youtube]sNGorPyX9OQ[/MEDIA]

  13. Brad Rousse

    Brad Rousse said:

    This is unfortunately the best way to deal with it; the "infected" are beyond hope and you need to focus on those who can be saved (IE, those who are confused or just starting to think there might be something). How often do we see on this website, for example, that no matter how much evidence is presented for the switch or the coal fire being nonsense that there's always an answer, always a wiggle out, always a goal post shift...

  14. mitfrc

    mitfrc said:

    Shame is, The Irish Aboard the Titanic is a seriously good work. Then he went off the rails with conspiracy theories.

View 40 comments...

Leave a comment

Find Related Items

Citation

Encyclopedia Titanica (2019) Titanic: Why she collided, why she sank, why she should never have sailed (Titanic Review, ref: #46, published 11 April 2019, generated 20th November 2022 08:00:19 AM); URL : https://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/titanic-why-she-collided-why-she-sank-why-she-should-never-have-sailed.html