Encyclopedia Titanica

Titanic's First 15 Minutes After the Collision: Jumping to Conclusions

Titanic Research and Modeling Association

   Join Us and Hide Ads

The British Board of Trade concluded that water was flooding the firemen’s tunnel on Titanic 5 minutes after the collision. This piece of evidence has been central in all analyses of the sinking since 1912. This paper shows that the water seen was not the result of direct collision damage, but rather overflow of the #1 hold at G-deck that occurred over 15 minutes after the collision.

Key Points

  1. Board of Trade Conclusion:

    • The BoT concluded that water was flooding the firemen’s tunnel on Titanic five minutes after the collision, indicating damage to the ship’s side abaft of bulkhead B.
  2. Hendrickson’s Testimony:

    • Lead fireman Charles George Hendrickson testified about seeing water rushing in from the starboard side at the bottom of the fireman’s passage.
    • This testimony has been pivotal in analyses of Titanic’s initial damage and subsequent flooding.
  3. Design and Flooding Dynamics:

    • The #1 hold was narrow and would have flooded quickly, potentially overflowing onto G-deck within 20 minutes of the collision.
    • The firemen’s passage was watertight except for the access from the #1 hold, and the twin spiral stairs ran from D-deck to the tank top.
  4. Timeline of Events:

    • Hendrickson was asleep during the collision and was awakened by Fireman Ford.
    • He went topside to the well deck, saw ice on the deck, and discussed the situation with others before deciding to return to his bunk.
    • Approximately 15 minutes after the collision, Hendrickson saw water coming in from the starboard side while descending the spiral stairs.
  5. Reevaluation of Testimony:

    • The water seen by Hendrickson was likely the result of overflow from the #1 hold at G-deck, not direct collision damage.
    • Other testimonies, including those of Firemen Alfred Shiers and James Taylor, support the idea that the water was from overflow rather than initial damage.
  6. Conclusion:

    • The BoT’s conclusion that the water seen was due to initial collision damage may have been premature.
    • The flooding observed by Hendrickson and Ford was likely due to the overflow of the #1 hold, occurring over 15 minutes after the collision.

About Research References on Encyclopedia Titanica
This item is not available to read on Encyclopedia Titanica, but we have included it as a reference and provided a brief summary of the key points to help readers interested in the finer details of the Titanic story.

Unfortunately we can't provide a current location for this resource, contact us for further details.

Find Related Items

Flooding Iceberg Damage Structural Damage Interpretation Hold #1 Overflow Iceberg Impact

Contribute

  Get in touch