Encyclopedia Titanica

True Course

An explanation of the use of magnetic compasses, how to plot courses and how these procedures on the Titanic compared to their use other ships in 1912

Titanica!

   Join Us and Hide Ads

“True Course” by Cathy Akers-Jordan and Captain Charles B. Weeks explains the navigational tools and procedures used on the Titanic, particularly focusing on the magnetic compass, course-plotting, and the influence of compass errors like variation and deviation. The article clarifies how Titanic’s officers calculated the “true course” despite compass limitations. Titanic’s navigation relied on standard magnetic compasses, which required adjustments for variation (differences between geographic and magnetic north) and deviation (errors from the ship’s metal structure). These complex calculations highlight the navigation challenges of the time, with quadrant-based courses differing from modern 360-degree methods.

by Cathy Akers-Jordan and Captain Charles B. Weeks

The use of magnetic compasses, how to plot courses and how these procedures on the Titanic compared to their use other ships in 1912 is something of a mystery to many observers. Yet an clear understanding of the equipment and procedures is crucial to correctly interpret testimony in the American and British Inquires. This article shall endeavour to clarify the issues.

True Course

A ship’s true course is determined by the direction from the ship to the geographic north pole (also called true north).Navigation charts andthe compass are labeled with true north, but setting a ship’s course is not merely a matter of steering in relation to the north pole. The magnetic compasses, like those on Titanic, point to the earth’s magnetic poles. Unfortunately the magnetic poles move around with time and do not line up with the earth’s geographic poles. Currently the North Magnetic Pole is just north west of Baffin Island in Canada and the South Magnetic Pole is just north of Australia. In 1912 navigators relied on magnetic compasses so they had to calculate the difference between magentic north and true north in order to determine a ship’s true course.

Magnetic Compasses

Magnetic compasses have existed since the 11th century, according to article 111 of Bowditch’s American Practical Navigator, 1995 Edition (2). They function because a magnetized needle floating freely will line up with the earth’s magnetic field, which lines up with the earth’s magnetic poles. The difference between true north and magentic north is called compass error. There are two kinds: variation, the difference between magnetic north and true north, and deviation, which is caused when the steel of the ship affects the magnetic compass. Both kinds of compass error must be taken into account when calculating a ship’s course.

Variation

Variation is the difference between the direction from a ship to geographic north and from a ship to magnetic north. It is named East or West depending on the ship’s position relative to these two poles.In theNorth AtlanticOcean variation is westerly, because when looking towards the North Pole, the North Magnetic Pole is to theleftof the North GeographicPole. Refer to Fig. 1Illustration of Variation. If a ship’s position were directly in line with both these poles then there wouldn’t be any variation.

Figure 1 Illustration of Variation (by R. Pundt)
Figure 1 Illustration of Variation
(by R. Pundt)

The amount and name of the variation in any location can be picked off the chart for that area. Because the magnetic poles are always moving, variation changes from year to year. The amount of variation is indicated on navigation charts each year. Refer to Fig. 2 Charting Variation.

Figure 2 Charting Variation (NOAA Chart 13288)
Figure 2 Charting Variation
(NOAA Chart 13288)

Variation can not be corrected, but must be taken into account when figuring the actual course to steer. To compensate for variation one adds the value of the variation to the true course to get the magnetic course.

Capt. Lord testified on the 7th day of the British Inquiry that the Variation in the area of the sinking at that time was 24 degrees W (question 6782).

Deviation

The other error found in a magnetic compass is called Deviation, which is caused by ferrous metal in close proximity to the compass. Deviation wasn’t a problem until the advent of iron and steel ships. Because the amount of steel varies, deviation varies from ship to ship, and from one magnetic heading to another.

There are a couple of ways to reduce deviation error when calculating what course to steer. First, one can reduce the amount of steel in close proximity to the compass so it will give the most accurate reading. This is why ships like Titanic had a compass on the top deck, away from the steel of the ship. That compass was called the Standard Magnetic Compass. Refer to Fig 3 Magnetic Compass in its Binnacle and Fig. 4 Close Up of Magnetic Compass with Azimuth Circle. The other magnetic compasses onboard (such as the Steering Magnetic Compass in the Wheelhouse) were checked against it.

Figure 3 Magnetic Compass in its binnacle (Photo by C. Weeks).
Figure 3 Magnetic Compass in its binnacle
(Photo by C. Weeks).

Magnets go in the open door. The red and green iron spheres are Quadrant al Correctors. The magnets and Quadrantal Correctors correct for deviation.

Magnetic Compass with Azimuth Circle
Figure 4 Close Up of Magnetic Compass with Azimuth Circle
(Photo by C. Weeks). The sun light is reflected off the mirror on the right intothe prism on the left which bends it down onto the compass card. Note the thin light line on the compass card, that indicates the bearing of the sun.

Second, a compass adjuster could, while swinging the ship on shoreside range marks, as depicted in Fig. 5 Shoreside Range Marks, arrange magnets and soft iron spheres around the compass to offset the effects of the ship’s structure, then note the residual error (remaining deviation) when he was finished.

 

Shoreside Range Marks

He then made a chart (Deviation Card) of this residual error, which was posted in the chartroom or wheelhouse so that the appropriate value could be picked off and used in figuring the course to steer by applying the deviation from the Magnetic Compass heading.

Capt. Lord testified onthe 7th day of the BritishInquiry thatthe Variation in the area of the sinking at that time was 24 degrees W, with a Deviation of 2E, making a [compass] error of 22W (question 6782). 24W – 2E = 22W.

As an example of how Deviation varies from ship to ship, notice that Californian’s Deviation was 2E; Titanic’s was 1E.

Applying Variation and Deviation

Courses laid down on navigation charts are labelled by their true heading, that is, their heading as regards Geographic (True) North. This is also represented by the meridians printed on the chart and the outer ring on the compass rose (refer to Figure 2 Charting Variation). By applying Variation, True plus Variation, one gets what is called the Magnetic Course (True adjusted for Variation). This would be the compass course in a vessel that had no metal in it.

Next, one applies Deviation to the Magnetic Course to get the Compass Course, i.e., Magnetic with Deviation applied. This is the heading on the magnetic compass that indicates a certain Geographic heading on the chart.

For a chart to calculate Variation and Deviation, refer to Figure 8 Titanic's Variation and Deviation Matrix.

Titanic’s Compass and Procedures

Standard procedure on Titanic was for the junior officer on watch to measure the sun’s azimuth bearing on the standard compass once per watch. This measurement was compared to the calculated bearing to determine compass error.

According to the International Mercantile Marine’s 1907 company book of regulations, captains were to “steady the ship on her course by standard [compass] every half hour, and must compare the compasses every Watch” (253). That meant the senior officer on watch had to compare the Standard Magnetic Compass (the most accurate) to the Steering Magnetic Compass every four hours.

Because Titanic’s Standard Magnetic Compass was on a raised platform between the second and third funnels, comparing it to the Steering Magnetic Compass in wheelhouse was not easy. Refer to Fig. 6 Titanic's Boat Deck, which shows the distance from the magnetic compass to the bridge (approximately 230 feet). The officer had to walk to the compass platform and indicate when the course was correct by pulling a bell which would ring in the wheelhouse. When the helmsman heard the bell, he knew the ship was on True Course and noted what course to steer on the Steering Magnetic Compass to maintain that course.

This procedure was not only very tedious and rife for error, but may have played a part in events on Titanic just before the accident by drawing an officer and spare helmsman away from the bridge where they could have been watching for ice.

Titanic's Boat Deck
Figure 6 Titanic's Boat Deck
(Photo by C. Weeks)
The distance from the compass platform to the bridge is approximately 230 feet.

The compass arrangement on Olympic class ships was different from other ships which had the Standard Magnetic Compass on the top of the Wheelhouse, fairly convenient to the Wheelhouse. Refer to Fig. 6 Titanic’s Boat Deck, which shows the distance from the compass platform to the bridge, and Fig 7 Titanic and Lusitania, which shows Lusitania’s magnetic compass on the flying bridge and Titanic’s magnetic compass platform between the second and third funnels.

Titanic and Lusitania
Figure 7 Titanic and Lusitania
(Photo by C. Weeks)
Lusitania’s Magnetic Compass on the Flying Bridge (between brown barrels). Compare to Titanic, behind Lusitania. Also compare to Fig. 6.

Navigation After 1912

Just before World War I the gyroscopic compass appeared on the scene. The gyro compass is an electro-mechanical device which basically functions like a gyroscopic top. When spinning and lined up with the meridian it holds that position regardless how the the ship moves around. It is not affected by deviation and variation and there is only one error, called gyro error. It is determined periodically by use of shoreside ranges or bearings of celestial bodies. These bearings are called Azimuths or, in special circumstances, Amplitudes. In either case one must compare the bearing as observed against the bearing as calculated. The difference is the gyro error. It is named East or West and has an amount, usually less than a degree. Thus the gyro compass comes closest to indicating Geographic North.

The RoyalNavy Battle cruisers, HMS Invincible and the HMS Inflexible had gyro compasses in December of 1914 when they fought at the Falklands; however, due to cost, most merchant ships did not have gyro compasses until after World War II.

Unfortunately, Titanic didn’t have a gyrocompass, only magnetic compasses. As a matter of fact, in addition to the Standard Magnetic Compass she had three Steering Magnetic Compasses: one in the Wheelhouse, one on the Captain’s Bridge, and one at the Emergency Steering Station on the After Docking Bridge. It needs to be understood that a more accurate compass would not necessarily have prevented the accident, which was primarily caused by not seeing the iceberg in time to avoid it.

More recently the use of GPS (Global Positioning System) has taken over for the compass. Because GPS receives fixes so frequently and compares them to the direction to the next waypoint it effectively shows what direction to head in. When hitched up to the steering control it will alter the ship’s heading to be headed towards that next waypoint automatically. This is what most modern ships do, although the officers do know how to correct True Course to Compass Course.

Modern Courses vs. Quadrant Courses

In 1912 Quadrant Named Courses were used; now 360 degree courses are used. Readers who are familiar with 360 degree courses might not understand the testimony of Titanic’s surviving officers regarding her course.

For example, in questions 13498 – 13501 of the British Inquiry Second Officer Lightoller said Titanic’s True Course was S 86 W, and that corresponded to N 71 W per the steering compass.

Quadrant Named Courses named their course first, from North (000 degrees) or South (180 degrees), then East or West

Quadrant Course Conversion 360 Degree Course
N 45 E 000 + 45 045
S 45 E 180 – 45 135
S 45 W 180 + 45 225

Therefore, Lightoller’s S 86 W is 180 + 86 = 266 degrees, so Titanic’s officers were steering 289 on the steering compass to make 266 true.

When a mariner wants to convert the True Course on the chart to his compass courses he uses a matrix like this to calculate the algebraic sum of deviation and variation:

W+       W-
-->       <--
True Var. Magnetic Dev. Compass
242 24W 266 1E 265
266 24W 290 1E 289

Figure 8 Titanic's Variation and Deviation Matrix (calculated by C. Weeks)

The top line of figures is the course before the course change at the “The Corner” (Lat. 42 N, Long. 47 W, where Titanic altered course from a Great Circle to head directly to NY); the second line is from after The Corner. The headings across the top indicate:

True The course laid down on the chart

Var. Variation

Magnetic Magnetic = True plus Variation

Dev. Deviation

Compass The Steering Magnetic Compass (directly in front of the Helmsman) = Magnetic minus Deviation

Compass is what Titanic’s officers were actually steering. Compass error is the algebraic sum of deviation and variation. Specifically:

266 (Standard Magnetic Compass = True plus Variation)
- 265 (Steering Magnetic Compass = Magnetic minus Deviation)
1 East (Titanic’s Deviation)

To summarize, in orderto understand the testimony of Titanic’s deck officers, readers need to understand the difference between the Steering Magnetic Compass and the Standard Magnetic Compass, how to account for Variation and Deviation, and the difference between Quadrant Named Courses and 360 degree courses.

References

Bowditch, Nathaniel. American Practical Navigator: an Epitome of Navigation. Washington: Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic Center, 1995. Internatiional Mercantile Marine Company. Ship's Rules and Uniform Regulations. Issued July 1st, 1907. “Chart 13288: Monhegan Island to Cape Elizabeth.” Washington: NationalOceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Aug. 17, 1985. Pundt, Ralph, Capt. Assistant Professor of Marine Transportation and Nautical Science. “Illustration of Variation.” Maine Maritime Academy. Castine, MA, Sept. 8, 2003. “Wreck Commissioners' Court Proceedings.” Titanic Inquiry Project. Rob Ottmers, ed. Copyright © 1999-2002: Titanic Inquiry Project. 5 Sept. 2003

© Cathy Akers-Jordon & Captain Charles Weeks 2003-12-06 Accepted for Publication 9 December 2003

Comment and discuss

  1. Cathy Akers-Jordan Cathy Akers-Jordan
    David H wrote: " I feel I have given out much information over the past couple of years regarding many ship board practices that were similar to Titanic's time but most of it unfortunately has fallen on deaf ears and has been a waste of my time. I would have preferred some straight answers to my questions and criticisms but that would have been too much for some I fear. Next Tuesday 13th, I shall be coming off line indefinitely as I can't be bothered to read this stuff much longer so if anyone wants a final ''dig'' before then they had better get their oar in quickly. " I'm sorry to hear that, David. I always enjoy reading your posts because I respect your knowledge and experience. I know the discussions can be frustrating at times, but that's why I appreciate reading them. Even when I disagree with something someone has written, I learn from it. Anyway, I hope you will keep your web site on-line and come back to ET once in a while. Best wishes, Cathy
  2. Cathy Akers-Jordan Cathy Akers-Jordan
    Hi Monica, How about this: shoreside range markings are just a way of measuring deviation when you are close to shore. Instead of comparing the ship's bearing to the azimuth of the sun, a star, or a planet, you swing the ship towards tall buildings you can see on shore (usually churches) and measure the deviation. Deviation varies as a ship's heading changes because the metal of the ship moves in relation to the ship's compass as the ship swings around (Kemp, Peter. The Oxford Companion to Ships and the Sea. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1976. p. 244). Here's how it works: I swing my ship to point at church A, then measure the deviation. Then I swing my ship to point at church B, and measure the deviation again. Comparing the two numbers helps me calculate the amount of deviation on my current heading. Does that make sense? If I am mistaken, I'm sure Charlie can set us both straight. He's the real expert! Cathy
  3. Parks Stephenson Parks Stephenson
    David, I understand and respect your right to debate the issue that Dave Brown raised. I have exercised the same right in this very thread. What I take issue with -- as I always have -- is your oft- and plain-stated disdain for the opinions and/or experience of others on this board, myself included. Speaking for myself, I have never doubted or belittled your sea-going experience, even when you were dismissing mine. But I'll be damned if I'll respond to your questions when I know that you'll only slap me for it. So, if you would like my response on information that you have provided, then you'll have to return some of courtesy that I attempt to show you. If you don't care about my opinion, then you can look to someone else for a response. In this most recent thread, I directed you toward the surviving crew remembrances because I know from previous conversations that you do not want to hear what I have to say. If you don't respect me, then maybe you would respect them. In other words, your 'sea stories" have not fallen on deaf ears...you just make it difficult for some, myself included, to respond to, or comment on, them. Silence does not mean that people aren't listening and learning. We're not aboard ship now...in a forum such as this, people won't respond to chastisement. My children taught me that lesson when I retired from our Navy and I'm still trying to learn it. What worked aboard ship doesn't always work on dry land. If asked, I would rather that you
  4. Charles B. Weeks Jr. Charles B. Weeks Jr.
    monica: Just to clarify something Cathy & I said. You have to have two fixed charted objects onshore, then you determine the compass bearing when they are in line. That is the heading of the range, while your ship is lined up on the range you observe the difference between your compass course and the range. This difference is total compass error. I wish you could make it to Maine in April, it will be very interesting, and we could show you some examples of ranges in the bridge simulator. Regards, Charlie
  5. Charles B. Weeks Jr. Charles B. Weeks Jr.
    Hello, my fellow Titanic enthusiasts: I am saddened to see all the acrimony that has arisen in this thread. We are all entitled to our own opinions, but we must respect others rights to their opinions. It is fine to disagree with someone else, but do it in a gentlemanly fashion. I view the whole Titanic issue like a large mosaic or picture puzzle. It is made up of many small pieces, each of us has a broad general interest in the whole picture, and a specific interest in one or more of the individual pieces. As I see it the only way we will ever put the puzzle together is by working together to fit the individual pieces that we each have been working on together. To do this might require some reshaping of individual pieces so they fit. I believe that the best sources of information are they primary sources. These are things like: testimony at either inquiry, testimony in court and publications by survivors. Everything else is a secondary or a further removed source. As we know the primary sources far from answer all the questions, this is where we have to fall back on our personal experience and knowledge, to fill in the gaps or make the pieces fit together. If we can work together and draw on each others strengths we have the best chance of making the pieces fit. Regards, Charlie
  6. Cathy Akers-Jordan Cathy Akers-Jordan
    Charlie, I'm looking forward to the bridge simulator! Cathy
  7. Michael H. Standart Michael H. Standart
    >>I am saddened to see all the acrimony that has arisen in this thread.
  8. monica e. hall monica e. hall
    Charlie, how I wish I could make it to Maine as well. And I can't resist simulators either, wish you hadn't told me about it. Thanks to you and Cathy - I think I have actually got it all straight now. Parks - was interested in your comment about your children teaching you that people won't respond to chastisement. Among other classes I do, I teach marketing to the Military (all services) who are about to retire into civilian life, and the most difficult thing they find is to step down from orders to co-operation. I think it's odd, as the services are always going on about teams and so forth, but when it comes to real team behaviour, they find it very difficult. I can see why - a team in the services has to do as it is told, no questions etc., but they do find the transition difficult - people actually have the temerity to ask 'Why'!
  9. Parks Stephenson Parks Stephenson
    So am I as there's no need for it. If one person or another claimed to be inspired inerrant on this or any other matter, that might be a different story, but this hasn't happened. Well, if one only looks at this thread in isolation, I can see that what you say is true. Given that perspective, I therefore apologise to the membership at large for taking the attitude I did with David without apparent provocation. Something which led to a loss of situational awareness just long enough for them to have a run in (Literally!) with a nasty surprise. Despite the way you worded it, I hope that you do not intend that to be a statement of fact. I have seen nothing that proves that First Officer Murdoch lost any situational awareness during his watch. On the contrary, my read through the evidence seems to indicate that he was quite alert and responsive to the situation. Monica, Yes, teamwork is important in the military and aboard a naval vessel, as it is in normal, successful life. The main difference I find between the military and civilian life is that in civilian life, a leader can often be questioned. In family life, leadership is a much more nebulous thing; in fact, I have given up any pretention of leadership in my household. The new puppy has more authority than me. :-) I was a fairly senior-ranking officer by the time I retired, and accustomed to having orders carried out without much question and with alacrity. I was also a single man for most of my military
  10. David G. Brown David G. Brown
    Parks-- no offense taken as I know that none was intended. Nothing good comes of weak debate. I expected resistance to my suggestions and demands for proof. Proof will be forthcoming in April if my plans come to fruition. With regard to Murdoch's loss of situational awareness...I am quite certain he was a victim of this problem, but no more than Captain Smith, Boxhall, Moody, Olliver, and Hichens. The problem that I am citing arose from the lack of communications among these men due to the physical layout of the bridge. Hence my original comments about the compass platform. And, while I believe their communal loss of awareness was the primary factor in the accident, I also agree that Murdoch's performance that night was otherwise above reproach. -- David G. Brown
  11. Parks Stephenson Parks Stephenson
    Dave, You have kept me informed of the progress of your theories all along and I have refrained from commenting in full on them for the various reasons that I have given you along the way. At this point, though, I will add another reason...I should wait for the totality of your research and reasoning and not comment on your draft in piecemeal fashion. After your plans come to fruition, and you have presented your case in full with all the evidence you would like to present, that would be the time for me to consider your argument and give you my best response. I wish that circumstance did not prohibit me from attending the April event...I would love nothing more to attend so we can enjoy a face-to-face. I would like again to thank both you and Capt. Weeks for the invitation and it is with the most serious regret that I am forced to decline. However, I know that 2004 won't be the last year for serious Titanic research, so maybe next time...? Parks
  12. Michael H. Standart Michael H. Standart
    >>Despite the way you worded it, I hope that you do not intend that to be a statement of fact.>I wish that circumstance did not prohibit me from attending the April event...
  13. Erik Wood Erik Wood
    Charlie, Although this does belong in a different thread, could you possibly update the thread on your event. My schedule is quickly getting busy.
View 43 comments... Open Thread Leave a Reply

Find Related Items

Course Quadrant Courses Navigation Variation And Deviation Compass Magnetic Compass

Contribute

  Get in touch

Citation

Encyclopedia Titanica (2003) True Course (Titanica!, ref: #2036, published 9 December 2003, generated 14th January 2025 02:03:35 AM); URL : https://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/true-course.html