Encyclopedia Titanica

Sarah Maybell Beckwith

Sarah Maybell Beckwith
Sarah Maybell Beckwith

Mrs Sarah Maybell Beckwith, known as Sallie, was born as Sarah Maybell Monypeny in Columbus, Ohio on 21 September 1865.

She was the daughter of William Monypeny (1830-1899) and Maria Brunson (1834-1920). Her father was Irish by birth, hailing from Co Armagh, whilst her mother was a native Ohioan. They were married on 5 February 1854 in Clermont, Ohio and Sallie's known siblings were: Charles (1854-1881), William Brunson (1860-1912), George Brunson (1866-1903) and Perrin Brunson (1878-1953).

Sallie appears on the 1870 census living in Columbus and her father was described as a commission merchant. She was married on 2 December 1885 to Logan Conway Newsom (b. 6 February 1851 in Ohio), a realtor, and they had a son, William Monpeny in 1887, followed by a daughter, Helen Monypeny, in 1892. The family remained in Columbus, Ohio and appear there on the 1900 census living at the home of Sallie's mother Maria in Montgomery Township. Sallie was widowed when her husband Logan died on 28 June 1901.

She was remarried in New York on 25 September 1903 to Richard Leonard Beckwith (b. 1874), also a realtor and from Connecticut. The couple settled in Manhattan and were frequent travellers.

In early 1912 Mrs Beckwith, her husband and daughter Helen had been touring Europe. Helen had become romantically involved with a young tennis player, Karl Behr, and part of the reason for this trip was to deflect Helen's interests and discourage the match. For their return to the USA the party boarded the Titanic at Southampton as first class passengers (the Beckwiths travelling on ticket number 11751 which cost £52, 11s, 1d) and they occupied cabin D35. At Cherbourg they were surprised to be joined by Karl Behr, who had travelled to Europe to pursue his courtship with Helen.

On the night of the sinking the Beckwith party assembled on the starboard boat deck following orders to abandon ship. Here they waited with Mr and Mrs Edwin Nelson Kimball and were soon joined by Karl Behr. When Mrs Kimball asked Bruce Ismay who was then assisting the boarding of lifeboat 5 if they could all go, Ismay replied "Of course madam, every one of you." The Beckwiths, Kimballs and Behr therefore entered lifeboat 5 and were saved.

Hard on the heels of her experiences on Titanic came the death of her brother William who died on 3 December 1912. Possible further consternation came when less than a year following the disaster Sallie saw her daughter Helen and Karl Behr wed, a match she disapproved of. She continued to live in Manhattan and also spent time living, it seems, in New Hampshire but she and her husband continued to travel frequently, visiting France, England, Monaco and Italy. She was a member of the Colony Club, and for many years had been on the board of managers of the West Side Day Nursery and Christadora House. 

Sallie was widowed in 1933 when her husband Richard died aged 58; she was also fated to outlive her son William 1 who died in 1942.

Sallie herself died at her home, 224 East Sixty-First Street, Manhattan, on 11 February 1955 aged 89. She was later cremated.

Notes

  1. William was married to a lady from Connecticut named Frances (b. 1895) and had a daughter named Sally in 1918. He worked as a stock broker and died on 1 February 1942.

References and Sources

National Archives : Passport Applications (1921)

Newspaper Articles

Washington Times (18 April 1912) Mrs. R. L. Beckwith
New York Times (2 March 1913) Titanic Survivors Marry
New York Evening Post (28 June 1915) Ismay As Behr Saw Him
New York Times (13 February 1955) Mrs. Richard L. Beckwith

Images

Pittsburgh Press (1912) Sallie Beckwith

Documents and Certificates

Search archive online

Comment and discuss

  1. Jeffrey M. Kern

    My great grandmother, who is 92 years old, recounted something to me that regarded a couple with the last name Beckwith. These particular Beckwiths owned property in Ventura County, California and wanted to adopt my grandmother's older brother, although her mother did not give him up for adoption to them. They remained good friends. I had a question (and as there is not much mentioned of the Beckwiths and their lives prior/after the disaster): did Mr and Mrs Beckwith own property in California? Or did Richard have any siblings? I thank anyone with an answer.
  2. Kritina Johnston

    Whilst (does anyone use this word anymore?) reading Pellegrino's "Ghosts of the Titanic", I came across this little bit of text: "...a leather satchel bearing the initials 'R.L.B.'... Mr. Tulloch had brought the satchel to the surface, and he wanted to return it to members of the Beckwith family, but the Beckwiths had refused it... Among the satchel's contents were a pocket watch, an initialed silver jewelry box, a gold-plated stick pin shaped into the Chinese symbol for good health, a pendant inscribed with 'May this be your lucky star,' and a bracelet with the name 'Amy' spelled out in diamond chips. The Beckwiths protested that there had never been an 'Amy' in their family..." There's also mention of a sapphire and diamond ring that matches one desrcribed in Charlotte Cardeza's insurance claim. Pellegrino implies that this is most likely evidence of theft by a crewmember. But what could be the real explanation?
  3. Randy Bryan Bigham

    If it was a theft, it looks like the crook did not make it off with his goodies.
  4. Randy Bryan Bigham

    Another thought on the theft angle - were the Beckwiths berthed near the Cardezas? Or in fact are any of the other items in the bag similar to ones listed in insurance claims?
  5. Kritina Johnston

    Well, doing a quick check on the site here, the Beckwiths were in D-35, and the Cardeza trio were in B51/53/55, those suites with the private promenade (what you can get for your money, or your husband's...) Pellegrino (also the name of a rather popular mineral water) suggests that the thief made his way via the Grand Staircase, thus implying that the person did a sort of smash and grab if you will. Interestingly, he also says that in the Beckwith satchel was a silver box marked with the initials "D.G." and states this could only have belonged to the Duff Gordons. What is one to make of that? And where can someone get a copy of the insurance claims filed by passengers? It would be interesting to compare what was in the satchel with what was in the claims.
  6. Beverly J. Crowder

    If you get a copy of the Eaton and Haas ,"Titanic: Triumph & Tragedy", it lists claims by survivors and by the families of lost loved ones. Beverly
  7. Ben Holme

    Wasn't a fountain pen with initials R.L.B recovered from the wreck site? I thought I saw it in a book.
  8. Randy Bryan Bigham

    Kritina, Very interesting theory Mr. P has. As to his notion that the little silver jewel box w/ the "D.G." initials could only have belonged to the Duff Gordons, I "ha' me doubts" on that. It could have stood for "Dorothy Gibson" for instance. If it was Lucile's I have to say that our mystery thief didn't get very much BUT the box because by her account she emptied what jewelry she had in her cabin into a bag which she took with her. Unluckily for both her and the alleged robber her most expensive jewels, including the $50,000 pearl necklace she hadn't insured, were all in the purser's safe. Still, it's fascinating that a thief may have been creeping about sloping decks stealing people's valuables. What nerve, huh? Just goes to show human nature hasn't changed much in nearly 90 years! Randy
  9. Charles Provost

    I have always thought that the bag was that of second purser Reginald L. Barker (R.L.B), thus would explain why there is such a diversity of jewels and valuables in the leather bag. Mr. Barker, realizing the ship was sinking, might have thought that it would be better to take the jewels out of the ship, put them in a bag and take them to a lifeboat. But somewhat an officer must have prevented him from taking a bag aboard a lifeboat, and was forced to leave it somewhere, or throw it in the water...
  10. Pat Cook

    I have to go with Charles here, if I may jump in here. I have always wondered why Reginald Lamond Barker hasn't been consideed the owner of the satchel. Here's a bit from Beesley, Chapter III: "Coming upstairs again, I passed the purser's window on F deck and noticed a light inside: when halfway up to E deck, I heard the heavy metallic clang of the safe door, followed by a hasty step retreating along the corridor towards the first-class quarters. I have little doubt it was the purser, who had taken all the valuables from his safe and was transferring them to the charge of the first-class purser, in the hope they might all be saved in one package." Not quite the 'smoking gun' but certainly an indication that Barker was removing all the valuables and, just a guess, a satchel would be ideal for transporting them. Thought I'd drop this in. Best regards, Cook
  11. Charles Provost

    Very interesting, I must say. It certainly supports the theory I am myself supporting.
  12. Pat Cook

    Glad to be of some help. What I can't figure out is why the satchel was immediately 'assigned' to Beckwith when Barker would be a much more logical candidate? Or am I missing something here? Best regards, Cook
  13. Randy Bryan Bigham

    Cook & Charles, I was only saying it was interesting theory. Believe me guys, I wouldn't stake much money on any of Pellegrino's claims! I believe he is a very inventive writer, to say the least, and I am. I just wanted to give credit where credit's due - the robber angle IS a pretty good story. Cook you are right about Beesley. His account may be less exciting but more believable by far. As to why Beckwith was assigned ownership you must know the answer to that but are too gentlemanly to say. There is none except the obvious - shoddy research by a bunch of scavengers out for bucks and soundbites. Randy
  14. Kritina Johnston

    It's really simple, Beckwith was a first class passenger, Barker was one of the crew. Too many researchers get hung up on the passengers to the exclusion of the crew sometimes (like the passengers would've put up with moving coal about for a millisecond...)
  15. Bill Wormstedt

    The first 'assignment' of the satchel (at least, the first I'm aware of) to Beckwith was on the TV show "Live from the Titanic" with Telly Savalas. I had a number of my Titanic books with me while watching the show. I remember them mentioning the RLB monogram, and how they were going to 'run it thru their computers' to find out whose it was. Given the kinds of things in the bag, I guessed first class and came up with Beckwith from the ANTR list faster than their computer did! I have to admit, the Barker id makes more sense than Beckwith.

Showing 15 posts of 25 total. View all.

Open Thread Leave a Reply Watch Thread

Titanic Passenger Summary

Name: Mrs Sarah Maybell Beckwith (Sallie) (née Monypeny)
Age: 46 years 6 months and 24 days (Female)
Nationality: American
Marital Status: Married to Richard Leonard Beckwith
Embarked: Southampton on Wednesday 10th April 1912
Ticket No. 11751, £52 11s 1d
Cabin No. D35
Rescued (boat 5)  
Disembarked Carpathia: New York City on Thursday 18th April 1912
Died: Friday 11th February 1955 aged 89 years
Cause of Death:
Buried: Ferncliff Cemetery, Hartsdale, New York, United States

Linked Biographies

Page Options

Watch this page

Improve this Biography

If you have any corrections or something to add please  get in touch